image

Parks are an important component of a healthy and sustainable city. Their mere presence helps to improve air quality, and those of us who bike often find ourselves using them as either destinations, or routes to pass through.

It’s no secret that Los Angeles needs more and better parks and recreational amenities. According to the most recent Los Angeles County Park Needs Assessment, less than half of County residents live within one-half mile of a park, and a majority of residents live in neighborhoods with less than 1.5 acres of park land per 1,000 population. As Investing in Place notes, places with poor park access tend to suffer from health disparities and economic hardships compared with better-served communities. And many of the parks that do exist are in a state of disrepair.

Taxes enacted in the 90s to fund parks are starting to expire, and it’s clear that in order to meet the needs of their residents, communities require significant funding beyond the meager property tax allocations in most municipal parks’ budgets. Measure A proposes to reinstate a 1992 parcel tax that has expired and extend another 1996 parcel tax that is set to expire in 2019. This revenue would support important investments  to build and rehabilitate parks, beaches, and natural areas, as well as the multi-use trails that people on bikes utilize to get around, avoid traffic, and to challenge themselves.

Measure A provides an important funding source to ensure a healthier city, and encourages more residents to get outside and enjoy it. We urge a “YES” vote on L.A. County Measure A.

image

Measure M graphic by Adam Linder

Measure M is Metro’s ambitious ballot measure to extend an existing ½ cent sales tax (2008’s Measure R) in perpetuity, and supplement it with another ½ cent sales tax. Creating a 1 cent sales tax with no expiration date gives Metro much more flexibility to expedite projects to flesh out its transportation system. Many of these projects are high profile: a transit connection to LAX, a transit tunnel under the Sepulveda Pass, a Northern extension of the Crenshaw Line that could hit West Hollywood, a transit line to serve the congested Vermont corridor, and closure of a gap of the L.A. River Bike Path through Downtown. Accordingly, Measure M features an impressive list of endorsements, including The Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, Investing In Place, Streetsblog LA, The L.A. League of Conservation Voters and The L.A. Times.

Somewhat lost in the big name projects necessary to gain broader support are the very real benefits to existing transit users and residents in the form of improved bus service, repair of L.A.’s decaying streets and sidewalks, and dedicated funding for the next generation of regional bikeways.

At 2% of the total funding, Measure M’s proposed allocation for biking and walking initially appears disappointing compared to more ambitious funding that advocates originally sought, but the reality is that funding for biking and walking is much more substantial than this percentage. Measure M marks the first time that dedicated funding for biking and walking has been built into such a funding measure (Measure R allocated 0%).

Additionally, as some Los Angeles County cities have policies and priorities for implementation regarding active transportation, more funding for biking and walking is likely to manifest itself within the 17% local return. But the biggest win for the biking community in Measure M – and one that is due in a great part to the advocacy work of Investing In Place – is the incorporation of first mile/last mile funding for biking and walking in the implementation of new transit lines under Measure M. As we have seen from construction of the Expo Line and Gold Line, the lack of quality access for people on bikes to stations is a major issue that – once addressed – could be a game changer for commuting by bike and bike share.

Measure M is not perfect: Metro will need to work to address housing and displacement in planning and implementation of new transit lines to ensure that improvements are made for communities rather than for speculators at the expense of existing residents and businesses. We are disappointed to see funding for unsustainable highway expansion in this Measure, but recognize it as a necessary evil to attract the necessary support to pass. Further, it is unfortunate that Measure M is proposed as a regressive sales tax rather than an income tax, but we understand this as the result of California’s problematic tax restrictions enacted in 1978’s Prop 13.

Measure M provides the funding framework and vision for a transformation of Los Angeles’ transportation system. Advocates will have to continue to work to make sure that funding is implemented efficiently and equitably, but we see it as a huge step towards building a transportation system with quality mobility options. Bike The Vote L.A. urges a “YES” vote on L.A. County Metro Measure M on November 8th.

On November 8th, Santa Monica residents will have the opportunity to fill 4 seats on its 7-seat City Council, thereby determining the majority of the City’s elected representation. Santa Monica has made great strides over the past few years in becoming a more bike- and transit-friendly city. Much work remains to be done, however, in providing safe first mile/last mile connections to transit lines, in building protected bike lanes to improve the quality of its bike network, and expanding its burgeoning bike share system.

Simultaneously, Santa Monica is at a crossroads, with a controversial ballot measure and some candidates that aim to address its traffic congestion by limiting the occupancy of the city, rather than by providing better, more sustainable, and more equitable mobility options.

Bike The Vote L.A. members have reviewed the Santa Monica City Council candidates and proposed Santa Monica ballot measures for the 2016 General Election, including public statements, and responses to a questionnaire we sent out to all candidates. See below for our grades of candidates for and ballot measures in the Santa Monica’s 2016 General Election.

image

 

2016 California General Election: Tuesday, November 8th, 7am-8pm
Santa Monica Ballot Information: http://www.smvote.org/
Register to Vote (deadline 10/21): http://bit.ly/btvregister
Find your polling place: http://lavote.net/locator

Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Gleam Davis

Councilmember Gleam Davis offers Santa Monica voters solid ideas and a proven track record of driving progress on mobility policy. Her responses to our questionnaire demonstrated deep knowledge of a broad range of topics, from bike share to parking to intersection design. Davis favors more ambitious work to complete the MANGo, including the notable addition of a traffic diverter to discourage cut-through car traffic. More broadly, she’d like the city to implement Dutch-style intersections to better protect cyclists from conflicts with cars. She supports expansion of the Breeze bike share system beyond the city limits and points to the need for more innovative features, such as adult tricycles, to serve the city’s senior population.

Davis championed removing Downtown parking minimums that force people who bike, walk, and take transit to subsidize the costs of vehicle parking. She also offered ideas for an impressively broad range of potential solutions to the first-mile/last-mile issue that go beyond bicycling to encompass walking and both fixed-route and on-demand transit. We could go on, but you really need to read Davis’ responses yourself to appreciate the obvious knowledge and consideration that’s gone into them. Gleam Davis is an experienced leader with a clear, compelling vision for the future of mobility in Santa Monica and the practical know-how to help make it a reality.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: A

[Click HERE for Gleam Davis’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Terry O’Day

Councilmember Terry O’Day has been a stalwart supporter of Santa Monica’s transformation into a more bicycle- and transit-oriented community. According to comments he made to Santa Monica Next, he’s also a regular walker and transit user and frequently bikes around Santa Monica. O’Day also has an excellent track record of supporting Santa Monica’s Bike Action Plan, low cost Big Blue Bus service, Metro’s Measure R-funded expansion of light rail, and Santa Monica’s Vision Zero policy. He’s also opposed to the harmful anti-growth Measure LV.

O’Day’s response to our questionnaire is as cohesive as it is thoughtful, calling for a complete rethinking of the city’s street infrastructure to prioritize the safety of people on foot and on bikes over convenience for other modes. From recognition of the need to close gaps in a bicycle network to stressing the need to prioritize implementation in order to achieve Vision Zero, it’s clear that O’Day is the kind of leader on mobility that Santa Monica residents and workers deserve.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: A

[Click HERE for Terry O’Day’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Ted Winterer

Mayor Pro Tem Ted Winterer has been a strong proponent of Santa Monica’s shift towards a more bike-friendly city with a keen understanding of what components are necessary to make commuting by bike safe and enjoyable. In his response to us, he outlines many of those components: a network of bicycle infrastructure, implementation of protected bike lanes, safety in numbers, and convenient bike parking.

But beyond that, it’s abundantly clear that Winterer  has a cohesive understanding of what it takes to make a more livable, sustainable, and connected community. In his experience as a Councilmember, he has a long track record of votes, stances, and advocacy to improve options for transit, biking, and quality pedestrian infrastructure. Santa Monica residents will do well to return Mayor Pro Tem Ted Winterer to office, where we are confident he will continue the push towards a city with quality mobility options across the board.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: A

[Click HERE for Ted Winterer’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Mende Smith

Mende Smith is a car-free Santa Monican who understands the role active transportation can play in solving the city’s mobility challenges. To improve safety, she expressed support for finishing the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway, reallocating road space away from cars, and lowering speed limits within city limits to 25 miles per hour. To reduce reliance on cars, Smith is in favor of revisiting and perhaps lowering the city’s off-street parking requirements. She also articulated a number of ideas to encourage more bicycling, most notably working to offer free rides on the city’s Breeze bike share system to residents. We’d like to see her flesh out some of her proposals a little more, particularly with respect to safe and convenient first mile/last mile options to and from transit. We also have some concerns in Smith’s previous vocalization of support for Measure LV. Nonetheless, Mende Smith has expressed a solid mindset and vision to ensure Santa Monica remains a regional leader on clean and innovative mobility.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: B+

[Click HERE for Mende Smith’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Tony Vazquez

While we did not receive a response to our questionnaire from Tony Vazquez – outlining his stance on safe streets – Mayor Vazquez does have a solid track record on improving mobility options in Santa Monica. As a member of City Council, Vazquez joined his colleagues in unanimously supporting many important safe and sustainable streets initiatives.

Since 2012, when Vazquez was elected to the City Council, he has joined his colleagues in supporting the region’s first public bike-share program, Breeze Bike Share, which officially launched late last year. He has also voted to adopt the city’s Pedestrian Action Plan, which lays out a comprehensive vision for making Santa Monica a safer and more desirable place to walk and includes a Vision Zero goal.

We would hope that Mr. Vazquez continues to join his colleagues in supporting these initiatives and more as Santa Monica continues to lead as a sustainable streets champion.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: B

[Click HERE for our summary of Tony Vazquez]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Terrence Later

Terence Later clearly gets that making biking safer and more comfortable is a great solution to reducing the amount of driving within Santa Monica. His interest in expanding Santa Monica’s bicycle network, improving access to transit through bike lanes, bike share, and strong support for Vision Zero all show that Later understands much of what it will take to improve mobility options for the City. However, Later’s support of Measure LV, which would require a public approval of individual residential projects, is problematic for encouraging an equitable and sustainable Santa Monica, as it would exacerbate Santa Monica’s imbalance between jobs and housing while doing nothing to speed up  commutes. Considering his desire to address Santa Monica’s traffic woes, we’d like to see Later embrace concepts such as unbundled parking, transit-oriented development, or even congestion pricing. While we have our concerns about Later, we nonetheless  appreciate that he comes from the right place in wanting to improve livability, mobility, and safety for all Santa Monicans.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: B-

[Click HERE for Terence Later’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Jon Mann

Jon Mann was kind enough to respond to our survey and voiced support for protected bike lanes, both on the MANGo complete street project and around the city – including removing parking where necessary to create them. However, the sour note he hit on bike share, as well as his opposition to Vision Zero and to most new development, is enough to give us pause in thinking that he holds the priorities necessary to improve safety on Santa Monica streets.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: C+

[Click HERE for Jon Mann’s questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Armen Melkonians

We unfortunately have little information on Armen Melkonians, particularly after receiving no response to our candidate questionnaire. In his short time active in Santa Monica, Mr. Melkonians has not advocated for – nor has he done any work on – sustainable transportation.

As a candidate, he co-authored Measure LV, which Bike The Vote L.A. opposes, and has made it a central component of his campaign. We believe Measure LV will undermine Santa Monica’s commitment to a more sustainable city. Mr. Melkonians has made questionable claims about the measure’s ability to fight traffic, but in the future, we would hope to see Mr. Melkonians incorporate support for safe streets as a component of his platform to address Santa Monica’s traffic woes instead of simply blaming development for its current state.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: C-

[Click HERE for our summary of Armen Melkonian]


Santa Monica City Council Candidate: Oscar de la Torre

We did not receive a questionnaire from Oscar de la Torre. Mr. de la Torre has been on the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District Board of Education since 2002 and has been a champion of underprivileged youth in the city for even longer.

However, the social equity of sustainable and safe streets has not been a focus of Mr. de la Torre’s and though he has been in a unique position to work at a grassroots level for positive outcomes for bike and pedestrian safety, especially at the school district, he has not demonstrated that it is a priority for him.

In his own neighborhood, Mr. de la Torre fought against improvements along the Michigan Avenue Greenway, a major access point for students commuting to Santa Monica High School, that would have made travel by foot or by bike safer and more convenient, including the realigning of on-street parking for a potential protected bike lane. He is also a supporter of Measure LV, which Bike the Vote L.A. has opposed because we believe it will undermine Santa Monica’s commitment to a more sustainable city.

We hope that whether he remains on the School Board or earns a seat on the City Council, Mr. de la Torre will reconsider the importance of championing safe streets not only to address traffic issues in the city but also to improve the lives of the city’s most underprivileged residents, many of whom cannot afford cars and must commute by bike or foot.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: C-

[Click HERE for our summary of Oscar de la Torre]


Measure LV: NO

As a group focused on improving the safety and quality of mobility options as well as the overall livability of cities and neighborhoods, we recognize the need for smart and sustainable development to address issues of housing affordability, equity, and mobility. Measure LV would only make automobile traffic worse and drive up housing prices, while leading to longer and less bikeable commutes for many people in Santa Monica and around the region. Bike The Vote L.A. urges a “NO” vote on Measure LV.

[Click HERE to read more about Bike The Vote L.A.’s opposition to Measure LV]

Candidate campaign page: http://www.gleamdavis2016.com/

Councilmember Gleam Davis offers Santa Monica voters solid ideas and a proven track record of driving progress on mobility policy. Her responses to our questionnaire demonstrated deep knowledge of a broad range of topics, from bike share to parking to intersection design. Davis favors more ambitious work to complete the MANGo, including the notable addition of a traffic diverter to discourage cut-through car traffic. More broadly, she’d like the city to implement Dutch-style intersections to better protect cyclists from conflicts with cars. She supports expansion of the Breeze bike share system beyond the city limits and points to the need for more innovative features, such as adult tricycles, to serve the city’s senior population.

Davis championed removing Downtown parking minimums that force people who bike, walk, and take transit to subsidize the costs of vehicle parking. She also offered ideas for an impressively broad range of potential solutions to the first-mile/last-mile issue that go beyond bicycling to encompass walking and both fixed-route and on-demand transit. We could go on, but you really need to read Davis’ responses yourself to appreciate the obvious knowledge and consideration that’s gone into them. Gleam Davis is an experienced leader with a clear, compelling vision for the future of mobility in Santa Monica and the practical know-how to help make it a reality.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: A

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. What is your opinion on the state of the mobility options available in Santa Monica? Is the City doing enough to enable safe and convenient travel for those of your constituents who walk, bike, or take public transit?

I think that the City has made tremendous strides in making all transit and active transportation options more appealing.  Breeze Bike Share and the recently reinvigorated Big Blue Bus routes have made real inroads into automobile usage around Santa Monica.  Also, we are constantly improving our infrastructure.  We have 2 protected cycle tracks (the Esplanade and near Santa Monica High School) and we recently installed scramble crosswalks in several downtown intersections.  Of course, as we transition away from an automobile-centric society, we will need to do much more.  The City has embraced the Vision Zero goal of improving pedestrian and cyclist safety and we need to continue to embrace walking and cycling infrastructure to make non-automobile methods of traveling as safe as possible.  We also need to look at infrastructure innovations such as Dutch crosswalks (such as the one that is installed in Davis, CA) that will make cycling and walking safer.

2. With so many residents and workers riding bikes in the city, what additional efforts should Santa Monica undertake to improve safety and convenience of bicycling?

First, we need to look for more opportunities to construct protected or, at least, separated bikeways.  There are many Santa Monicans committed to cycling but the real test is how do we get people who don’t ride bicycles to give cycling a try.  As I speak with people around town, safety seems to be one of the primary concerns.  If we could make it safer trough the use of dedicated and separated bikeways throughout town, I believe that we would increase ridership.  In the meantime, programs like Kidical Mass are important because they teach children and their parents how to safely ride on our streets.  Second, we need to make sure that we are enforcing traffic laws that protect cyclists and pedestrians.  I am an advocate for getting more police out on the street enforcing laws that make automobile vs. cyclists accidents less likely.  Finally. I think we need to realize that our older population do not see bikes as a real alternative.  I think the City needs to do more outreach to this community to talk about options such as electric bikes, URB-E scooters, and adult tricycles as options.  I believe that if we get more people out on bikes and other alternative forms of transportation, the better and safer it will be for all cyclists.

3. With the arrival of Expo light rail to Santa Monica, there has been much discussion about the best way to provide access for residents and visitors to the stations. How do you think first mile/last mile connections – the ability to walk, bike, or take take transit between one’s residence and the stations – can be improved?

First, I think we really need to change people’s mindset.  In many cities such as Boston, New York, or Chicago, people think nothing of walking a mile to get to work or transit.  In Santa Monica, people seem to be resistant to walking more than a quarter of a mile to anything.  For most people, walking is the easiest, most convenient way to get to the nearest Expo or bus stop and so we need to encourage this most basic form of transportation.  Second, we need to look for increased funding for Big Blue Bus operations so that we can add routes and increase frequency.  If the bus comes more frequently and there are even more routes, bus service will become more convenient and thereby be a more attractive alternative.  Finally, we need more innovative programs such as Blue@Night that gets folks to and from the 17th Street/SMC station on Friday and Saturday nights for $3 each way to and from any location in Santa Monica.

4. Santa Monica has championed multimodal transportation with initiatives like GoSaMo, policies like “no net new car trips” within the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, and comprehensive policy documents like the Bike and Pedestrian Action Plans. However, the city’s zoning requirements maintain high off-street parking requirements for new construction, even near high-quality transit. Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that parking requirements encourage more people to drive. How can the city reconcile these contradictory positions? Will you champion reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums for new development projects?

Unfortunately, many people view abundant off-street parking as prerequisite for any project.  (The Council once approved a housing project in downtown Santa Monica with NO parking but it could not get financing due to its lack of parking.)  In the zoning code, while we maintain parking minimums, we give developers the option of doing an independent parking study to support a request for reduced parking requirements.  We also have unbundled parking in projects so that people willing to forego an auto, are not paying for parking.  I have championed reduced parking requirements.  For example, in connection with the landmarked post office building at 5th and Arizona in downtown Santa Monica, I successfully removed the parking requirement of 23 deed-restricted, off-site spaces that the Planning Commission had imposed.  I also have worked to try and create a central reservoir of shared parking in the downtown area so that we can remove all parking requirements from adaptive reuse and infill projects.  I think as we move forward and more people reduce their vehicle miles traveled, it would be appropriate to consider reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums in areas well-served by transit.   

5. The Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway was one of the city’s first major multimodal routes, but it remains incomplete. Have you ridden or walked the Greenway? What still needs to be done, in your opinion, to make walking and bicycling on Michigan safer and more pleasant? Would you consider removing or relocating on-street parking in some places to create a protected cycletrack along the route?

I have walked the MANGO and I am very familiar with it.  I think that the first thing we need to do is seriously study the possibility of placing a traffic diverter at the end of it.  Unfortunately, on school mornings, MANGO becomes a automobile thoroughfare to Santa Monica High School.  Without Safe Routes to School program, we are trying to convince families that there are much better alternatives (biking, Big Blue Bus) than driving to school.  But as long as it is easy to go down Michigan, cross Lincoln, and pull right into the high school drop-off zone, Michigan Avenue, at least in the mornings, will be dominated by cars.  By not allowing cars to travel across Lincoln, we can discourage much of that traffic.  The idea of a protected cycle track is intriguing.  As many of the buildings in the MANGO area are old and do not have parking for tenants, we would have to study the issue before removing parking.  However, I think it would be a great place for our first lengthy protected bikeway.

6. Santa Monica launched L.A. County’s first public bike share system, Breeze, last November. Since then, it has seen steady growth and recently hit the milestone of having 30,000 active users. How can the system be improved? Would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of bikes in the system by 50 percent over the next year? And would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of hubs or relocating underperforming hubs to serve high-use areas of the city?

Breeze is a wonderful addition to our mobility options.  I think the system can be improved by pushing hubs farther into the residential community to make them even easier for residents to use.  I also think that we need to push for the vendor to create adult tricycles that can be used at the hubs so that folks who feel unsteady on a bicycle have an option.  Finally, I think we need to continue to look for opportunities to place hubs outside of Santa Monica (e.g. Brentwood) to increase convenience and usage.  If the usage figures justify it, I definitely would support increasing the number of bikes in the system in the next year and beyond to whatever level will make the system more usable and convenient.  One of the great things about the Breeze system is that we can measure demand and identify places where we might need hubs as well as the most popular and underperforming hubs.  We, of course, should use this data to increase the number of hubs where warranted, place larger hubs where they are needed, and relocate or shrink underperforming hubs.

Candidate campaign page: http://www.terryoday.com/

Councilmember Terry O’Day has been a stalwart supporter of Santa Monica’s transformation into a more bicycle- and transit-oriented community. According to comments he made to Santa Monica Next, he’s also a regular walker and transit user and frequently bikes around Santa Monica. O’Day also has an excellent track record of supporting Santa Monica’s Bike Action Plan, low cost Big Blue Bus service, Metro’s Measure R-funded expansion of light rail, and Santa Monica’s Vision Zero policy. He’s also opposed to the harmful anti-growth Measure LV.

O’Day’s response to our questionnaire is as cohesive as it is thoughtful, calling for a complete rethinking of the city’s street infrastructure to prioritize the safety of people on foot and on bikes over convenience for other modes. From recognition of the need to close gaps in a bicycle network to stressing the need to prioritize implementation in order to achieve Vision Zero, it’s clear that O’Day is the kind of leader on mobility that Santa Monica residents and workers deserve.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: A

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. What is your opinion on the state of the mobility options available in Santa Monica? Is the City doing enough to enable safe and convenient travel for those of your constituents who walk, bike, or take public transit?

I’m very pleased with two of my first accomplishments in City Council that improved our mobility options.  First was adopting a Bike Action Plan and moving over $7 million of funding to our capital budget for bike infrastructure improvements.  Second was bucking our staff, which proposed a Big Blue Bus fare increase, to keep BBB fares lowest in the region.  Because of my leadership on this issue, have seen our mobility options flourish.  The Expo Light Rail has arrived, but the work that brought us to that point should not be taken for granted.  In 2007, I cofounded Move LA and proposed Measure R, which was adopted by a 67.9% vote and is raising $40 billion for transit, including Expo Line to Santa Monica.  The accompanying Expo Bike Path has given us a phenomenal dedicated bike path to downtown LA.

All this progress improves on decades of car-centric planning, but it does not erase it.  We need to move ahead in a couple key actions.  First, revise the Bike Action Plan considering the experience of the investment in these last few years.  Too many critical linkages are missing between our existing pathways and there are still easy opportunities to improve our network.  Second, we must more deeply embed our Vision Zero objective by further investing if enhancement to our pedestrian and bike safety.  Third, we must turn our mobility infrastructure on its head by creating a loading order of priorities for use of our public space – pedestrians, then bikes, then transit, then shared cars, than private cars.  When I started this work, I used to hear “Why should we have a bike lane on XX street, when YY street is just a couple blocks away.”  By honing our priorities as I described, we would ask why would cars get two parallel streets, if bikes do not.

2. With so many residents and workers riding bikes in the city, what additional efforts should Santa Monica undertake to improve safety and convenience of bicycling?

First and foremost, we need to increase segregated and buffered bike lanes.  Additionally, increasing green-painted lanes and prioritized signaling for bikes.

3. With the arrival of Expo light rail to Santa Monica, there has been much discussion about the best way to provide access for residents and visitors to the stations. How do you think first mile/last mile connections – the ability to walk, bike, or take take transit between one’s residence and the stations – can be improved?

There are some important segments of road that we need to improve for pedestrian and bike safety, with lighting, painting, signaling, such as 26th Street between Cloverfield and Olympic.  Importantly though, we need to develop complete travel routes.  Many of our connections are broken at key places, for example the Cloverfield bridge is quite dangerous.  These connections would finish the complete routes necessary to be an actual “mile” in the first/last mile discussion.

4. Santa Monica has championed multimodal transportation with initiatives like GoSaMo, policies like “no net new car trips” within the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, and comprehensive policy documents like the Bike and Pedestrian Action Plans. However, the city’s zoning requirements maintain high off-street parking requirements for new construction, even near high-quality transit. Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that parking requirements encourage more people to drive. How can the city reconcile these contradictory positions? Will you champion reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums for new development projects?

Reducing the impact of cars in our community has been my most consistent theme in my public service over more than a decade.  I introduced decoupling the rental of parking spaces from the rental of apartments in the city, by introducing environmental planning experts to the Planning Commission and proposing this on project after project until it was adopted in our zoning update.  I also fought for parking maximums instead of minimums and achieved it, though not to the scale I continue to seek.  I have also called for revision of our parking preference zones, which work very poorly and encourage car ownership (as perhaps noted in your question below).  I have also advocated trading parking for affordable housing and other benefits in new development agreements.

5. The Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway was one of the city’s first major multimodal routes, but it remains incomplete. Have you ridden or walked the Greenway? What still needs to be done, in your opinion, to make walking and bicycling on Michigan safer and more pleasant? Would you consider removing or relocating on-street parking in some places if it meant being able to create a protected cycletrack along the route?

I live on the Greenway and use it daily.  I strongly favor a cycletrack, removing parking, adding parklets, and improving safety.  I am concerned that the project in its current incomplete state, has not adequately improved bike safety on Michigan Ave.

6. Santa Monica launched L.A. County’s first public bike share system, Breeze, last November. Since then, it has seen steady growth and recently hit the milestone of having 30,000 active users. How can the system be improved? Would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of bikes in the system by 50 percent over the next year? And would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of hubs or relocating underperforming hubs to serve high-use areas of the city?

I am strongly in favor of increasing the number of bikes and hubs.  Because it is a network, the Breeze system gets better with more nodes and more users.  Its success suggests that we can and should increase it further.

Candidate campaign page: http://www.tedforcouncil.com/

Mayor Pro Tem Ted Winterer has been a strong proponent of Santa Monica’s shift towards a more bike-friendly city with a keen understanding of what components are necessary to make commuting by bike safe and enjoyable. In his response to us, he outlines many of those components: a network of bicycle infrastructure, implementation of protected bike lanes, safety in numbers, and convenient bike parking.

But beyond that, it’s abundantly clear that Winterer  has a cohesive understanding of what it takes to make a more livable, sustainable, and connected community. In his experience as a Councilmember, he has a long track record of votes, stances, and advocacy to improve options for transit, biking, and quality pedestrian infrastructure. Santa Monica residents will do well to return Mayor Pro Tem Ted Winterer to office, where we are confident he will continue the push towards a city with quality mobility options across the board.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: A

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. What is your opinion on the state of the mobility options available in Santa Monica? Is the City doing enough to enable safe and convenient travel for those of your constituents who walk, bike, or take public transit?

We’ve made great progress in recent years with the implementation of the first phase of our Bicycle Action Plan which added many new miles of bike lanes and other safety features; the rollout of the Breeze Bike Share system; the integration of the Big Blue Bus routes with the Expo line, new discounted “Any line, any time” bus passes for SMMUSD students, and amenities like $3 can rides from the 17th Street Expo stop when the BBB stops running at night; and the adoption of the Pedestrian Action Plan and improvements like the ped scrambles downtown. Since I’ve shared a car with my wife since 2002 I frequently opt for carbon light or carbon free travel modes so I know from experiences these options have become more convenient and safe. Are we where we want to be yet? No. But we’re working hard at it.

2. With so many residents and workers riding bikes in the city, what additional efforts should Santa Monica undertake to improve safety and convenience of bicycling?

My family of four has four personal bikes and one two-person cargo bike so we ride a lot. Road safety has improved considerably in recent years with new bike lanes and sharrows and enough bike ridership to have made auto drivers more accustomed to sharing the road. The next step on safety is to add more dedicated Class IV bike lanes – we’ll soon be doing so on 17th Street and need to roll out more. As for convenience, I often can’t find bike parking at places like Main Street because all the racks are occupied, so we need to add more corrals at major cycling destinations.

3. With the arrival of Expo light rail to Santa Monica, there has been much discussion about the best way to provide access for residents and visitors to the stations. How do you think first mile/last mile connections – the ability to walk, bike, or take transit between one’s residence and the stations – can be improved?

My hope is that we’ll begin to see an increase in BBB ridership in the next few years which will allow us to augment bus service to and from the Expo stops. For biking Class IV lanes will encourage easier and safer access to Expo, hence our efforts on 17th Street. For walking we need to continue the capital improvements envisioned by the PAP and change our traffic signals so that a “Walk” signal comes on automatically instead of when requested by a pedestrian via a push button. We also need to eliminate the option for autos to make a right turn when peds have the right-of-way at scrambles.

4. Santa Monica has championed multimodal transportation with initiatives like GoSaMo, policies like “no net new car trips” within the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, and comprehensive policy documents like the Bike and Pedestrian Action Plans. However, the city’s zoning requirements maintain high off-street parking requirements for new construction, even near high-quality transit. Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that parking requirements encourage more people to drive. How can the city reconcile these contradictory positions? Will you champion reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums for new development projects?

One of the great challenges during our hearings on our zoning update was to get people to understand that unbundled parking, reduced parking requirements and parking maximums are the wave of the future and that investing capital in parking that increases the cost of new housing is folly when all indicators are that car ownership and use will continue to decline in the future. However, we did reduce our parking requirements near transit; we did allow for the unbundling of parking; and we will significantly reduce parking requirements in our new downtown plan. And where we left the old parking codes in place we did so to discourage displacement of existing housing and residents and to encourage housing providers to focus on commercial zones and downtown.

5. The Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway was one of the city’s first major multimodal routes, but it remains incomplete. Have you ridden or walked the Greenway? What still needs to be done, in your opinion, to make walking and bicycling on Michigan safer and more pleasant? Would you consider removing or relocating on-street parking in some places to create a protected cycletrack along the route?

Honestly, MANGo has failed to live up to our expectations. To make walking safer we have to relocate crosswalk further away from the traffic islands so motorists aren’t diverted into the pedestrian realm. And I’d be willing to look at some limited changes to on-street parking if we studied the demand for it, although I’d first prefer to see if with a road diet we can put a cycle track between the car parking and the sidewalk. But yes, we need to have our planners look at the greenway to see what need to be done to increase utilization by pedestrians and cyclists.  Completion of the eastern sections such as The Wiggle should also help; sadly, little progress has been made with the school district on extending the greenway west through the Samohi campus so we may have to look at other options to eventually connect the Expo bike path to the beaches.

6. Santa Monica launched L.A. County’s first public bike share system, Breeze, last November. Since then, it has seen steady growth and recently hit the milestone of having 30,000 active users. How can the system be improved? Would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of bikes in the system by 50 percent over the next year? And would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of hubs or relocating underperforming hubs to serve high-use areas of the city?

Honestly, I can’t commit to a 50% increase in the number of bikes in the next year, although I wish I could. The initial capital outlay for the bikes came primarily from a Metro grant and given that we have a finite CIP budget with which to fund other mobility projects, a new fire station, park expansions, etc. a promise to spend millions more on new Social bikes in the next 12 months would be an empty one. That said, I very much support increasing the number of bikes in smaller increments and once the system starts running in the black we can allocate those funds to expanding the number of hubs and bicycles. As for relocating underperforming hubs that’s already part of the plan – the genius of the system we chose is that the stations are very easy to move since they’re just racks bolted into pavement.

image

Candidate campaign page: http://www.mendesmith.com/

Mende Smith is a car-free Santa Monican who understands the role active transportation can play in solving the city’s mobility challenges. To improve safety, she expressed support for finishing the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway, reallocating road space away from cars, and lowering speed limits within city limits to 25 miles per hour. To reduce reliance on cars, Smith is in favor of revisiting and perhaps lowering the city’s off-street parking requirements. She also articulated a number of ideas to encourage more bicycling, most notably working to offer free rides on the city’s Breeze bike share system to residents. We’d like to see her flesh out some of her proposals a little more, particularly with respect to safe and convenient first mile/last mile options to and from transit. We also have some concerns in Smith’s previous vocalization of support for Measure LV. Nonetheless, Mende Smith has expressed a solid mindset and vision to ensure Santa Monica remains a regional leader on clean and innovative mobility.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: B+

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. What is your opinion on the state of the mobility options available in Santa Monica? Is the City doing enough to enable safe and convenient travel for those of your constituents who walk, bike, or take public transit?

I do not own a car. I am able to sustain a healthy lifestyle on foot and or my bike, and my partner has a vehicle we use for distances. I have a Metro Pass. I work and play locally. All of these lifestyle choices are good for urbanites.

The Big Blue Bus has been a great program for creating more climate-friendly transit, trying to burn clean while moving commuters and all that is fine. The Expo was another great addition to the city, but I think that the only way to discourage all-day traffic here is to hike the parking fees through the roof and pivot our tourists toward public transportation.  I dig the public bikes – but the ratios for our bike lanes could use revitalization.  

2. With so many residents and workers riding bikes in the city, what additional efforts should Santa Monica undertake to improve safety and convenience of bicycling?

Maybe it’s possible there is a way to make the breeze bikes free for residents if registered by address? If elected to CC, I will happily take on the project to enable fewer car-centric plans and advocate for pedestrian / bike-friendly alternatives. Also, we can reduce speed limit to 25 mph in the city limits to encourage commuter safety. Mayor Cuomo did this in NYC and reduced the in-city accidents overnight as a part of Vision Zero.

3. With the arrival of Expo light rail to Santa Monica, there has been much discussion about the best way to provide access for residents and visitors to the stations. How do you think first mile/last mile connections – the ability to walk, bike, or take transit between one’s residence and the stations – can be improved?

The transit stations have parking lots. Shuttling options in major cities have had some success, though the age of commuters is a factor in SM – younger workers prefer their own vehicles to bussing and many say they would rather ride skateboards than wait for shuttles. It is possible that all-day rates and/or day passes can be issued to employees in the city, and extending incentives to businesses offering the bus or bike solution is another way to encourage alternative transportation for weekday-only travelers.

4. Santa Monica has championed multimodal transportation with initiatives like GoSaMo, policies like “no net new car trips” within the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, and comprehensive policy documents like the Bike and Pedestrian Action Plans. However, the city’s zoning requirements maintain high off-street parking requirements for new construction, even near high-quality transit. Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that parking requirements encourage more people to drive. How can the city reconcile these contradictory positions? Will you champion reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums for new development projects?

It is ridiculous to offer the high-off street parking in SM. If we are truly committed to a greener plan in our city, we can scratch the car-centric and revisit the drawing board. There are bike-friendly communities teeming from Seattle to Portland with plans already in motion that are green. I am certain we can get a look at some of the plans working in nearby Urbania to sway the locals to a newer standard of living one development at a time.

5. The Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway was one of the city’s first major multimodal routes, but it remains incomplete. Have you ridden or walked the Greenway? What still needs to be done, in your opinion, to make walking and bicycling on Michigan safer and more pleasant? Would you consider removing or relocating on-street parking in some places to create a protected cycletrack along the route?

Absolutely. Relocating and rebuilding is the best way to make this project fly.  I would opt for every city employee to hop on one of the bikes and cycle it to experience firsthand what improvements can be made. Funds were allocated to finish the project, so let’s finish the project. If healthier lifestyles are all we can hope offer our locals here by the beach, I say we get to work improving the Greenway – and expanding it to capacity.

6. Santa Monica launched L.A. County’s first public bike share system, Breeze, last November. Since then, it has seen steady growth and recently hit the milestone of having 30,000 active users. How can the system be improved? Would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of bikes in the system by 50 percent over the next year? And would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of hubs or relocating underperforming hubs to serve high-use areas of the city?

As I already mentioned above, I think a public bike pass is a great option for locals exclusively. Increasing our cycletrack reduces our car-centric grid. Reducing our car lanes will encourage more residents and local tourists to get outside and move.  If we can make Bike hubs, transit stations, pedestrian-friendly areas and thoroughfares work efficiently in a beachside community, who knows how healthy our city will be in the next 20 years?

Candidate Info: http://www.smvote.org/Candidates/detail.aspx?id=53687094836

While we did not receive a response to our questionnaire from Tony Vazquez – outlining his stance on safe streets – Mayor Vazquez does have a solid track record on improving mobility options in Santa Monica. As a member of City Council, Vazquez joined his colleagues in unanimously supporting many important safe and sustainable streets initiatives.

Since 2012, when Vazquez was elected to the City Council, he has joined his colleagues in supporting the region’s first public bike-share program, Breeze Bike Share, which officially launched late last year. He has also voted to adopt the city’s Pedestrian Action Plan, which lays out a comprehensive vision for making Santa Monica a safer and more desirable place to walk and includes a Vision Zero goal.

We would hope that Mr. Vazquez continues to join his colleagues in supporting these initiatives and more as Santa Monica continues to lead as a sustainable streets champion.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: B

image

Candidate campaign page: http://www.votenowforlater.com/

Terence Later clearly gets that making biking safer and more comfortable is a great solution to reducing the amount of driving within Santa Monica. His interest in expanding Santa Monica’s bicycle network, improving access to transit through bike lanes, bike share, and strong support for Vision Zero all show that Later understands much of what it will take to improve mobility options for the City. However, Later’s support of Measure LV, which would require a public approval of individual residential projects, is problematic for encouraging an equitable and sustainable Santa Monica, as it would exacerbate Santa Monica’s imbalance between jobs and housing while doing nothing to speed up  commutes. Considering his desire to address Santa Monica’s traffic woes, we’d like to see Later embrace concepts such as unbundled parking, transit-oriented development, or even congestion pricing. While we have our concerns about Later, we nonetheless  appreciate that he comes from the right place in wanting to improve livability, mobility, and safety for all Santa Monicans.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: B-

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. What is your opinion on the state of the mobility options available in Santa Monica? Is the City doing enough to enable safe and convenient travel for those of your constituents who walk, bike, or take public transit?

I think Santa Monica has done a great job so far, and I would love to see us keep moving forward to encourage residents to leave their cars parked.

2. With so many residents and workers riding bikes in the city, what additional efforts should Santa Monica undertake to improve safety and convenience of bicycling?

I love to ride my bike around town and I feel like I can do so pretty safely, as long as I obey traffic laws. I would like to see more dedicated bike lanes so it is easier for cyclists to travel without having to worry about vehicles that may not be following the traffic laws, and paying close attention to non-vehicle traffic.

3. With the arrival of Expo light rail to Santa Monica, there has been much discussion about the best way to provide access for residents and visitors to the stations. How do you think first mile/last mile connections – the ability to walk, bike, or take take transit between one’s residence and the stations – can be improved?

We should prioritize the installment of new dedicated bike lanes to these locations.

4. Santa Monica has championed multimodal transportation with initiatives like GoSaMo, policies like “no net new car trips” within the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, and comprehensive policy documents like the Bike and Pedestrian Action Plans. However, the city’s zoning requirements maintain high off-street parking requirements for new construction, even near high-quality transit. Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that parking requirements encourage more people to drive. How can the city reconcile these contradictory positions? Will you champion reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums for new development projects?

What I would like to see is voter approval of new developments, as we have a referendum to establish this year. I think voters know what is best in terms of development of our city and we should let residents approve new large-scale projects. I think this will reduce the amount of new development from the trend we have seen recently, and will consequently reduce the number of new cars in the city.

5. The Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway was one of the city’s first major multimodal routes, but it remains incomplete. Have you ridden or walked the Greenway? What still needs to be done, in your opinion, to make walking and bicycling on Michigan safer and more pleasant? Would you consider removing or relocating on-street parking in some places to create a protected cycletrack along the route?

I have both ridden and walked along the MANG and I do think we should have a protected cycletrack to facilitate non-vehicle transportation.

6. Santa Monica launched L.A. County’s first public bike share system, Breeze, last November. Since then, it has seen steady growth and recently hit the milestone of having 30,000 active users. How can the system be improved? Would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of bikes in the system by 50 percent over the next year? And would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of hubs or relocating underperforming hubs to serve high-use areas of the city?

I think the Breeze system is brilliant. I would like to see more bikes, though I am not sure if 50% is appropriate. We should increase in smaller increments until we reach full usage without any underused hubs. If there are persistently underused hubs, we should relocate those to higher use areas.

Candidate info: http://www.smvote.org/Candidates/detail.aspx?id=53687094966

Jon Mann was kind enough to respond to our survey and voiced support for protected bike lanes, both on the MANGo complete street project and around the city – including removing parking where necessary to create them. However, the sour note he hit on bike share, as well as his opposition to Vision Zero and to most new development, is enough to give us pause in thinking that he holds the priorities necessary to improve safety on Santa Monica streets.

Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Grade: C+

(See below for full candidate questionnaire response)

1. What is your opinion on the state of the mobility options available in Santa Monica? Is the City doing enough to enable safe and convenient travel for those of your constituents who walk, bike, or take public transit?

City council and staff are trying to dupe residents into believing they are a bike friendly city, but their token efforts are pure propaganda and provide a false picture of traffic relief.

In fact the traffic crisis has made it too dangerous to bike around Santa Monica; especially downtown.

2. With so many residents and workers riding bikes in the city, what additional efforts should Santa Monica undertake to improve safety and convenience of bicycling?

Stop the over development because it is what is making the traffic crisis worse.

Provide free alternative transportation options. Look ar other cities that actually  make cycling safe with barries to protect us from cars.

3. With the arrival of Expo light rail to Santa Monica, there has been much discussion about the best way to provide access for residents and visitors to the stations. How do you think first mile/last mile connections – the ability to walk, bike, or take take transit between one’s residence and the stations – can be improved?

Sure it can, but not by this Santa Monica Renters Rights City Council.

Ed King of the BBB in only interested in increasing bus revenue and has been taking steps that force passengers to walk and bike more between stops, fewer choice and more connections without transfers.

Buses need to have stops close to Expo line but not where it is across from Bloomingdale, causing people to jay walk.

I would close downtown SaMo to traffic and provide free jitneys and more buses to get people around.

4. Santa Monica has championed multimodal transportation with initiatives like GoSaMo, policies like “no net new car trips” within the Land Use and Circulation Element of the General Plan, and comprehensive policy documents like the Bike and Pedestrian Action Plans. However, the city’s zoning requirements maintain high off-street parking requirements for new construction, even near high-quality transit. Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated t hat parking requirements encourage more people to drive. How can the city reconcile these contradictory positions? Will you champion reduced parking requirements or even parking maximums for new development projects?

I will champion NO more OVER development, EXCEPT for more LOW income housing so cyclists can AFFORD to live AND work in Santa Monica!

Once more! I will champion NO more OVER development, EXCEPT for more LOW income housing so cyclists can AFFORD to live AND work in Santa Monica!

5. The Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway was one of the city’s first major multimodal routes, but it remains incomplete. Have you ridden or walked the Greenway? What still needs to be done, in your opinion, to make walking and bicycling on Michigan safer and more pleasant? Would you consider removing or relocating on-street parking in some places to create a protected cycletrack along the route?

I haven’t seen the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway, but I absolutely advocate removing on-street parking in some places to create cycletrack PROTECTED wth Barriers throughout the city. The present SMRR City council will NEVER allow that because theier priority is to accommodate visitors and to hell with residents needs!

6. Santa Monica launched L.A. County’s first public bike share system, Breeze, last November. Since then, it has seen steady growth and recently hit the milestone of having 30,000 active users. How can the system be improved? Would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of bikes in the system by 50 percent over the next year? And would you be willing to commit to increasing the number of hubs or relocating under performing hubs to serve high-use areas of the city?

Breeze is fine for tourists and should only be expanded to fit the demand as long as it pays for itself and isn’t turned into another payoff for Santa Monica Renters Rights cronies.

Residents are better off to order a bike on BikesDirect.com rather than pay the rip off price for using the clunky Breeze bikes!