image

UPDATED: Bike The Vote L.A. has changed its position to no endorsement in the Los Angeles City Council District 1 race. Statement here: http://bit.ly/cd1rsnd

2017 Los Angeles CD1: No Endorsement

CD1 Run-Off Election day: Tuesday, May 16th, 7am-8pm
Find your Council District: http://neighborhoodinfo.lacity.org/
Find your polling place: http://lavote.net/locator

For the past decade, Joe Bray-Ali has been a fixture across Los Angeles, pedaling his bakfiets cargo bike from Northeast Los Angeles to the Westside, advocating for safer streets and better access for children to schools and parks. He led the first community group meeting to bring awareness to the pedestrian and bicycle safety needs of North Figueroa Street (later called  “Figueroa for All”) at his bike shop Flying Pigeon in 2009. Since then, he has been a tireless spokesman for livable streets, voicing his concerns at City Hall and in various public forums, as well as organizing countless all-ages bike rides to encourage Angelenos to enjoy the benefits of traveling by two wheels. Now a candidate for City Council, Bray-Ali offers an approach informed not only by his organizing, but also by a focus on the importance of safe streets as a backbone for strong and connected communities.

L.A.’s 1st Council District, which Bray-Ali is seeking to represent, has had a tumultuous recent history. Four years ago, then-State Senator Gil Cedillo won a narrow victory in a hard-fought and often ugly battle for the CD 1 seat. During that campaign, Cedillo spoke enthusiastically about the role bicycling could play in creating a better transportation system. Not long after that campaign, however, Cedillo changed his position.

In 2014, Councilmember Cedillo notified residents that he had decided to halt to a shovel-ready street safety project on North Figueroa Street that included bike lanes. In 2015, Cedillo was one of two city councilmembers to vote ‘No’ on Mobility Plan 2035, citing a concern over increased traffic as a reason not to provide safe, convenient alternatives to driving. We may never get a straight answer regarding Cedillo’s change of heart, but it is unfortunate considering that most of the people in harm’s way on CD 1 streets are low-income and immigrant workers without access to cars — some of the same vulnerable residents that Cedillo spent much of his state legislative tenure working to protect.

A regular lack of responsiveness to local concerns by Councilmember Cedillo’s office has spurred a number of challengers in the race to serve the 1st District

(note: Councilmember Cedillo’s campaign did not respond to a Bike The Vote L.A. questionnaire). Among them, both Giovany Hernandez and Joe Bray-Ali offered thoughtful and encouraging responses to Bike The Vote L.A.’s questionnaire (Update: Of the candidates who responded to Bike The Vote L.A., only Bray-Ali has progressed to the May 16th run-off). As a bike mechanic-turned-bike co-op founder-turned-bike shop owner-turned-safe streets advocate-turned-political candidate, Bray-Ali’s knowledge of transportation issues in CD 1 is unparalleled.

Through Bray-Ali’s transformation from community advocate to candidate for elected office, we’ve gotten a window into the local election process, as well as Bray-Ali’s own evolution in engaging on a wide spectrum of important issues. We appreciate Bray-Ali’s community-centric approach to governance, which will be important as he works to solve problems and meet challenges throughout the District. In order to ensure bike, pedestrian and transit facilities are implemented effectively, Bray-Ali will need to work with a diverse range of mobility advocates like LACBC, Multicultural Communities for Mobility, and Los Angeles Walks. He’ll also need to engage community members, tenant rights groups, and social justice organizations to ensure that existing residents from Highland Park to Pico-Union are able to make use of quality of life improvements that are long overdue to their communities.

As Los Angeles moves forward as a leader on immigrant rights and as a defiant sanctuary city under a racist Trump administration, the need to work together to protect and improve the lives of all residents – especially immigrants – becomes that much more critical. We appreciate Bray-Ali’s commitment to elevate community voices as a necessary change from the norm. Knowing that his hands-on approach will lead to supporting a stronger community, Bike The Vote L.A. endorses Joe Bray-Ali for City Council District 1.

(See below for Joe Bray-Ali’s response to Bike The Vote L.A.)

1. What future do you see for active mobility, and public transit in the daily lives of Angelenos, particularly those who lack access to cars and rely on these other modes as their primary way of getting around?

This is really two questions. First, the future if we continue on our current path, and second, how I would change things if elected.

If we were to continue as we are, the 1st Council District will remain a collection of broken links between work, school, and home for people walking, riding bikes, or taking transit. Sadly, this path will result in less commerce, more collisions and more lives lost due to a lack of street safety.

If elected, I would act immediately to fund and implement the numerous completed plans to improve conditions for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users (e.g. North East Linkages Plan, 2010 Los Angeles Bike Plan the 2008 Making the Connections plan by Metro, and others). My vision for the 1st Council District is that of a multi-modal, bike- and walk-friendly, region linking the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valleys with the Los Angeles Basin where safety and user experience are prioritized.

2. A high percentage of people without access to cars in Northeast Los Angeles, especially immigrants, depend on bikes as a way to get to work and school, but lack safe options to commute. Additionally the prevalence of speeding on L.A. streets takes a deadly toll on those who walk and bike, including seniors and children. Mobility Plan 2035 established “safety first” as the priority in transportation decisions, and the City has since adopted the ‘Vision Zero’ program with the goal of eliminating traffic-deaths within 10 years. Do you support prioritizing the safety of Los Angeles’ most vulnerable commuters, both in CD1 and throughout Los Angeles, even when there may be trade-offs in terms of automotive travel time or on-street parking?

I am committed to eliminating traffic deaths. I founded a community group, Fig4All, in 2013 with neighbors to work towards a safer North Figueroa Street. I have hosted forums, protests, rides, rallies, meetings, written op-eds, spoken publicly in City Hall and elsewhere, and have been interviewed by local and national media about my position on re-orienting Los Angeles towards the needs of the person on foot, on a bicycle, or using transit. The 1st Council District boasts some of the highest walking and transit commuter modal splits in the city (particularly in the MacArthur Park and Chinatown areas).

There very well may be trade-offs required to make the city friendlier to active transportation users. As a veteran of the bruising 2010 LA Bike Plan process and implementation, I am prepared to make those trade-offs – but only after taking robust feedback from the public, and only after we’ve set metrics to check whether or not a given design or device is performing to our expectations.

I am ready to work with everyone interested in making our streets safer and more productive, and I am committed to Vision Zero.

3. Los Angeles’ traffic woes are compounded by the reality that many parents and workers don’t feel safe commuting even short distances or performing school drop-offs on foot or by bike. What would you do as Councilmember to improve active transportation options around schools, public transit, and in commercial districts to provide better transportation options for CD1 residents?

As a small business owner, a parent, and an activist for safe streets I have several proposals that address improving active transportation around school, transit, and our commercial districts (and parks!).

At my small bike shop, we have benefitted from a series of small interventions – a neighboring business installed movable planters on the sidewalk in front of our building and a bench under a large tree. These small, privately funded, efforts to orient the street towards pedestrians and to make our noisy, slightly run-down, block appear attractive and safe have meant we enjoy a slow, but steady, trade from people passing by on foot. Two blocks aways, a small business owner has tried something similar but has had his efforts to provide shade at a bus stop and a tiny seat for a nearby payphone get ripped out by city employees with threats of legal action. As a councilman, I support small scale, removable, interventions that bring beauty and novelty to our commercial areas.

As a parent, I have been responsible for taking my child to school and back. I use a special cargo bike to do this, and the the dangerous street designs between our home and her classroom mean that I will likely never feel safe letting her ride to school alone until she is an adult and seasoned cyclist. Further, once at school there are several significant problems facing anyone on foot, using a bicycle, or transit – all of which I wil act to address if elected.

Public school sites typically have no traffic management plans, no on-site secure bike storage, and no employee transit pass subsidies. That is to say, they typically are planned and run as if no other mode exists but the private car and yellow school buses. If elected I will make sure that each school campus has repaired sidewalks and curb ramps, adequate bus stops and shelters for Metro or DASH bus services, and street designs that facilitate walking and cycling. I will implement a bike- or walk-to-school program that actually ensures safe routes to school and I will fight to obtain secure on-site bike parking for students and employees. All of these efforts combined will reduce automobile traffic to ensure safe streets around schools.

As an active transportation advocate, I am deeply concerned about the diseases of a sedentary lifestyle that are baked into the cake in Los Angeles due to auto-centric planning. It is a moral imperative that this city reorients its urban planning, transportation design, and resource management towards a drastic reduction in the leading causes of death and poor quality of life in this city.

4. Angelenos recently approved Metro’s transportation funding plan, Measure M, with an impressive mandate of support from over 71% of voters. What opportunities do you see for Measure M to improve the options for Angelenos get around in CD1 and elsewhere? Given that Measure M will return millions of dollars directly to the City of Los Angeles each year, do you support increased funding to make biking and walking in the city easier and safer for Angelenos?

Making sure the Measure M money is spent well in Los Angeles is critical to making this regressive tax work for the people feeling it the most in their pocketbooks. There is a high correlation in the 1st Council District between our poorest areas and a high rate of active transportation mode split. Travelling in these areas on foot or on a bicycle, it is clear that we have Amsterdam-like rates of non-car trips but next to no investment in making those trips pleasant and safe.

Additionally, we can induce more active transportation trips in areas of the 1st Council District that have average active transportation mode splits with well-executed, thoroughly vetted (through robust community outreach), walk-, transit- and bicycle-oriented design interventions around mass-transit, connecting broken links for these modes to schools, groceries, parks and health centers.

Measure M is a tremendous opportunity to save lives and support healthy transportation choices. I will not overlook the power to do good in many domains with the money Measure M brings to the table and am excited to get to work bringing a 21st century mobility network to Los Angeles and Council District 1.

5. Despite being prioritized for bicycle infrastructure under the 2010 Bike Plan, having injury rates that place it towards the top of LADOT’s High Injury Network; implementation of continuous bicycle infrastructure on North Figueroa Street has stalled, in part based on a prioritization of vehicle speeds over safer mobility options. Will you commit to implementing quality bicycle infrastructure on North Figueroa during the next Council term?

North Figueroa Street, like every former streetcar route in the 1st Council District, deserves quality pedestrian and bicycle projects. These projects must close the gaps between neighborhoods, parks, schools, job centers, and existing development.

On balance, the need to maintain a smooth and safe flow of private automobiles will be central to any new plans drawn up for our major commercial boulevards.

The 1st Council District also has a regional importance for bicyclists.  In particular it has the potential to connect the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valleys to each other via the LA River and to connect these two valleys with the Los Angeles Basin via Spring Street, Mission, Main, and North Broadway. The Westlake and Pico Union areas also play a regional role for cyclists into and out of Downtown between Mid-City and Koreatown. These connections demand a world-class cycle-track network, and I am committed to ensuring that these connections are made and maintained.

6. Los Angeles is beginning to employ bike share as a new transportation option, but many barriers to access remain, particularly the cost of riding and the fact that a credit card is needed to use the system. Some cities have offered subsidies to low-income riders and cash payment options to address these issues. What can the City of Los Angeles do to help as many residents as possible enjoy the benefits that bike share will bring?

The operator of Metro’s bike share runs a similar program in Philadelphia that allows for cash payments – a model we can potentially implement in Los Angeles. Full TAP card integration is in the works and will help ease enrollment in the Bike Share for the “un-banked”. TAP cards were initially pitched to the public as a system of allowing bank-like services for Metro’s primary system users: low-income residents. I will work to ensure this promise is realized.

Finally, bike share’s impact must be amplified with a first-class, on-street, protected bike network. In cities across the world, this is a model that has worked over and over again to ensure that people are able to choose healthier modes of travel and reduce congestion in our urban core.

Below is 2017 City Council District 1 Candidate Giovany Hernandez’ full questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.:

 1. What future do you see for active mobility, and public transit in the daily lives of Angelenos, particularly those who lack access to cars and rely on these other modes as their primary way of getting around?

Los Angeles is currently in one of the largest construction booms in its history. With this level of development that we are witnessing comes more retail/business space along with a plethora of mixed-used housing units. There has to be a different way to increase mobility in this city as our population grows. As a supporter of Measure M, I am hopeful the expansion of rail/subway/bus systems will get us to the necessary improvements we need to see in this city in regards to our public transportation. However, it’s imperative to have inclusive policies that ensure these new services are affordable and don’t leave out our cyclists community found in all corners of this city.

2.

A high percentage of people without access to cars in Northeast Los Angeles, especially immigrants, depend on bikes as a way to get to work and school, but lack safe options to commute. Additionally the prevalence of speeding on L.A. streets takes a deadly toll on those who walk and bike, including seniors and children. Mobility Plan 2035 established “safety first” as the priority in transportation decisions, and the City has since adopted the ‘Vision Zero’ program with the goal of eliminating traffic-deaths within 10 years. Do you support prioritizing the safety of Los Angeles’ most vulnerable commuters, both in CD1 and throughout Los Angeles, even when there may be trade-offs in terms of automotive travel time or on-street parking?

Pedestrian represent more than one-third of traffic deaths in Los Angeles County, a rate higher than the national average. Yes, I support prioritizing the safety of Los Angeles’ most vulnerable commuters, both in CD1 and throughout Los Angeles. Part of my platform to increase safety in our district is to work towards more visible crosswalks, repairs of our sidewalks, school zone signage, new traffic signals lacking in dangerous intersections, more bike lanes, and address mobility concerns that exist for our physically impaired population.

3. Los Angeles’ traffic woes are compounded by the reality that many parents and workers don’t feel safe commuting even short distances or performing school drop-offs on foot or by bike. What would you do as Councilmember to improve active transportation options around schools, public transit, and in commercial districts to provide better transportation options for CD1 residents?

Using my community organizing skills and bridge building approach I would bring together Metro, all schools (traditional public schools, charter schools, parochial, magnets and private schools), and parent groups to come to a collective solution. I don’t believe only one city department can improve this issue, we have to bring all stakeholders together. The city needs to develop a stronger partnership with all our school groups to improve our neighborhoods as our schools shape our city, but our neighborhoods also shape our schools.

4. Angelenos recently approved Metro’s transportation funding plan,

Measure M, with an impressive mandate of support from over 71% of voters. What opportunities do you see for Measure M to improve the options for Angelenos get around in CD1 and elsewhere? Given that Measure M will return millions of dollars directly to the City of Los Angeles each year, do you support increased funding to make biking and walking in the city easier and safer for Angelenos?

The opportunities I see with the passage of Measure M in improving the options for Angelenos to get around in CD1 and elsewhere I presume to be manifested in the repairs of our streets and sidewalks. The necessary work to improve traffic flow as the measure aims to minimize the time Angelenos are stuck in traffic. It also calls for keeping the fares affordable for our seniors and students which is crucial to stimulate more usage of public transportation. The expansions of rails and bus systems will also be another way to encourage motorists to use an alternative to commute. Now more than ever, in one of the largest construction booms this city has seen in decades, which will only increase our population we must invest in programs like this to improve the options for Angelenos to get around. With that mentality lies my support for funding for making walking and biking easier and safer in Los Angeles.

5.

Despite being prioritized for bicycle infrastructure under the 2010 Bike Plan, having injury rates that place it towards the top of LADOT’s High Injury Network; implementation of continuous bicycle infrastructure on North Figueroa Street has stalled, in part based on a prioritization of vehicle speeds over safer mobility options. Will you commit to implementing quality bicycle infrastructure on North Figueroa during the next Council term?

The high concentration of traffic collisions that result in severe injuries and deaths, with an emphasis on those involving people walking and bicycling taking place on North Figueroa is extremely concerning to me. My mentality and approach to representing would be one of putting altruism and people first in our local politics, not profits and special interest groups. I certainly, will commit to implementing quality bicycle infrastructure on North Figueroa during this next council term so that we can make an immediate dent in dwindling the numbers of injury/death rates in traffic collisions involving pedestrians/cyclists.

6.

Los Angeles is beginning to employ bike share as a new transportation option, but many barriers to access remain, particularly the cost of riding and the fact that a credit card is needed to use the system. Some cities have offered subsidies to low-income riders and cash payment options to address these issues. What can the City of Los Angeles do to help as many residents as possible enjoy the benefits that bike share will bring?

Good leadership isn’t always about reinventing the wheel. It’s imperative to learn about what’s working elsewhere and try different approaches to get to the common good. The Bay Area Bike Share program to begin this coming spring is a wonderful idea for a more equitable bike share program that would increase its accessibility and usage by reducing its membership cost and providing the ability for folks to pay in cash. I would love to be an advocate for such a program here in Los Angeles.

Below is 2017 City Council District 1 Candidate Jesse Rosas’ full response to Bike The Vote L.A.’s 6-point questionnaire:

“Thank you for your interest in this democratic process, and for reaching out to me as a candidate. I support all transportation and safety plans that do not impose one-size-fits-all solutions on all parts of the city. Bicycle riders, pedestrians, transit users and car drivers all deserve fair treatment, and should all respect each other. To make our streets safer, we need a variety of solutions such as signals, better enforcement, speed bumps and speed cushions, curb extensions, roundabouts, and bicycle lanes where appropriate. However, I do not believe bike lanes are appropriate for York or Figueroa. We can recommend traffic cameras. There are many other things we can do to improve safety on York, Figueroa, Avenue 64 and other streets. Thank you again for your questions.”

image

(This post will be updated as additional candidate forums are scheduled and publicized. Heard of a forum not listed here? Please let us know at bikethevote@gmail.com)

Mayor, City of Los Angeles
2/15, 5pm: Mayoral Candidate Forum hosted by Greater Hollywood Area Neighborhood Councils at 2035 N Highland Ave

Los Angeles Council District 1
2/16, 7pm: CD1 Candidates Forum hosted by Glassell Park Improvement Association at 2050 N San Fernando Road
2/20, 7pm: CD1 Candidate Forum hosted by Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council at 2821 Baldwin St
2/23, 7pm: CD1 Candidate Q&A hosted by Highland Park Neighborhood Council on Facebook Live
3/1, 7pm: CD1 Candidates Forum hosted by Human Resources at 410 Cottage Home St

Los Angeles Council District 3
(No debates currently scheduled)

Los Angeles Council District 5
1/14, 10am: CD5 Candidate Forum hosted by Coalition of HOAs
2/12, 2pm: CD5 Candidate Forum hosted by Leo Baeck Temple at 1300 N Sepulveda Blvd

2/14, 7pm: CD5 Candidate Forum hosted by Beverly Wilshire HOA

2/16, 6:30pm: CD5 Candidate Forum hosted by Westside Village HOA at 11000 National Blvd
2/19, 4pm: CD5 Town Hall hosted by Beverlywood HOA
2/21, 7pm: CD5 Debate hosted by Westwood Neighborhood Council at 10750 Ohio Ave

2/25, 12pm: CD5 Candidate Forum hosted by Mid City West Community Council at

5515 Wilshire Blvd

Los Angeles Council District 7
2/11, 11am: CD7 Candidate Forum hosted by Pacoima Chamber of Commerce
2/17, 11:30am: CD7 Election Forum hosted by VICA at 16600 Sherman Way #170

Los Angeles Council District 9
2/23, 6pm: CD9 Candidate Forum hosted by CD9 Coalition at 2901 S Central Ave

Los Angeles Council District 11

2/16, 7pm: CD11 Candidate Forum hosted by Pacific Palisades Residents Association at 11960 Sunset Blvd
2/27, 6:30pm: CD11 Candidate Forum hosted by Westside Regional Alliance of Councils at 11351 Westminster Ave

Los Angeles Council District 13
1/19, 5:30pm: CD13 Candidate Forum hosted by Silver Lake Neighborhood Council at 650 Micheltorena St
2/17, 6:30pm: CD13 Candidate Forum hosted by Hollywood Studio District Neighborhood Council at 4959 Lemon Grove Ave
2/27, 7pm: CD13 Candidate Forum hosted by Echo Park, Silver Lake & Atwater Neighborhood Councils at 2414 Mayberry St

Los Angeles Council District 15
2/16, 5pm: CD15 Candidate Forum hosted by I Heart Wilmington at 620 N Avalon Blvd

Los Angeles Measure S (Housing Ban)
2/17, 8am: NIMBY or Nice? hosted by Westside Urban Forum at 11301 Olympic Blvd
2/26, 1pm: Measure S Forum hosted by Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance at 11505 W Olympic Blvd
2/28, 6pm: Press Play Live hosted by KCRW at 4800 Hollywood Blvd
2/28, 7:30pm: Measure S Public Forum hosted by Mid City West Community Council at 543 N Fairfax Ave
3/1, 7:30pm: Measure S and the Future of Growth hosted by Third Los Angeles Project at 900 E 4th St

West Hollywood City Council
1/18, 6pm: West Hollywood Candidate Forum hosted by West Hollywood Chamber of Commerce at

625 N San Vicente Blvd

 

Pasadena City Council
2/23, 7pm: Pasadena Candidate Forum hosted by Pasadena Complete Streets Coalition at 300 S Los Robles Ave

image

2017 Los Angeles CD5 Endorsement: Jesse Creed

Primary Election day: Tuesday, March 7, 7am-8pm
Find your Council District: http://neighborhoodinfo.lacity.org/
Find your polling place: http://lavote.net/locator

Los Angeles’ 5th Council District, which takes in Westside neighborhoods east of the 405 freeway, is an area of enormous but mostly untapped potential for active transportation. As the home to UCLA and its dynamic student population, a thriving office district in Century City, three brand new Expo Line stations with a planned Purple Line extension in the works, and residents yearning for alternatives to soul-crushing traffic; the district is well positioned and in desperate need to chart a bold new course toward better and more sustainable mobility options.

Unfortunately, under incumbent Councilmember Paul Koretz, residents have seen a string of missed opportunities to create safer streets, from a sidewalk never added near an Expo Line stop to a gap in the Expo bike path that remains unfilled. One welcome exception to this trend has been the road diet and bike lanes along Motor Avenue in Palms, which have helped to revitalize an emerging community hub. And Koretz’ role in overseeing the construction of the Expo Line itself, now a rousing success, should be acknowledged – even if he seeks to distance himself from the failure to grade-separate the crossing at Overland Avenue.

But there is one particular missed opportunity that overshadows the rest. When presented with a chance to address a long history of crashes and injuries along a crucial cycling route to UCLA, Koretz abandoned all pretense of working toward consensus on bike safety improvements for Westwood Boulevard. Not content to stop there, Koretz poured considerable energy into denying future generations the mere possibility of those improvements by getting even a broad vision of bike lanes on Westwood removed from Mobility Plan 2035, short-circuiting more than four years of public input. Koretz consistently expresses support for environmental issues, but he fails to connect that commitment to urban policies, and to prioritizing active transportation as an alternative to driving.

Jesse Creed, on the other hand, has been a breath of fresh air, having articulated a strong vision for making it safe for Angelenos of all ages, abilities, and travel modes to get around, recently expanded on in a December 2016 op-ed for the L.A. Daily News. In his response to our questionnaire, Creed showed an impressive commitment to the safety of the most vulnerable users of L.A.’s streets, calling attention specifically to the challenges facing seniors and youth.

Creed also voiced support for completing the promised, but never-finished, study of Westwood traffic safety, and for bringing all stakeholders back to the table to arrive at a workable solution. He also emphasized that in order to lead, one must eventually move from listening and consensus-building to action, and “make decisions based on facts.” We think the facts support a decision to install the bike lanes, and after his recent press conference in which he reiterated his commitment to improving safety on Westwood, we are heartened to see that Creed is willing to consider those facts.

The rest of Creed’s questionnaire response is impressive for its breadth and depth of knowledge, touching on the need for thoughtful expansion of L.A.’s nascent bike share system, the opportunity presented by Measure M local return to expand the City’s investment in livable streets, and a note of urgency on L.A.’s Vision Zero initiative, which holds a great deal of potential but has suffered from a lack of visible progress so far.

For these reasons, we are excited to see Creed emerge as a prominent challenger in the Council District 5 race, and we look forward to seeing him provide the leadership needed to work toward safer and more sustainable transportation alternatives for all of the district’s residents. We endorse Jesse Creed as an outstanding leader who will help Council District 5 to realize its full potential.

(See below for Jesse Creed’s response to Bike The Vote L.A.)

1. What role do you see for walking, biking, and transit in improving the lives of Angelenos?

While Los Angeles has come a long way in just the past decade, we still don’t have a transportation system that provides great options to get around safely, regardless of their age, ability, or the way they travel. People feel trapped on the Westside with no good way to get in and out of their neighborhoods for several hours each day. Meetings get scheduled to avoid traffic and parents lose precious time with their children while idling in gridlock.  We need to make District 5, and the whole city, more transit-oriented with mobility options that are safe, widely accessible, reliable, and affordable to everyone. Implicit in that vision is the need to protect our most vulnerable community members: older adults aging-in-place in our wonderful neighborhoods, children walking and biking to school, and students traveling to UCLA. If we prioritize walking, biking, and public transit, we can help make Los Angeles a place that’s easier to get around, while reducing the number of people stuck in our notorious traffic.

I encourage you to read my op ed in the Daily News to get a sense of my thinking on transportation issues through the lens of one part of the network.  You can read it here  http://www.dailynews.com/opinion/20161210/la-leaders-must-step-up-on-sidewalk-safety-guest-commentary

2. In 2015, Los Angeles approved Mobility Plan 2035, the first update to the Transportation Element of its General Plan since 1999. Mobility Plan 2035 puts “safety first” in transportation decisions, and provides a vision for a transportation system composed of safe and quality transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and automotive options. Do you support the goals of this plan, and how would you like to see the plan implemented in CD5?

Yes.  Council District 5 has some of the best neighborhoods in terms of quality of life, but we also have huge job centers that generate an incredible amount of traffic on our major streets: Wilshire, Santa Monica, Sepulveda, Overland, Westwood/National, and Ventura—not to mention the 405. These streets can’t handle the demand if everyone drives, so it’s important that we build streets that support other modes. Mobility Plan 2035 is a smart approach: it recognizes that not every street can prioritize every mode, but that every mode needs a complete network. That allows the City to focus on bus and bike lanes where they will have the most benefit to the system.

Mobility Plan 2035 also revolutionizes the City’s approach to neighborhood traffic management by establishing a clear set of standards to keep cut-through traffic off neighborhood streets and prioritize walking and biking on the neighborhood network. This is another win-win—residents desperately want traffic calming, and it can be implemented in a way that creates a family-friendly bike network that connects schools, parks, and other local destinations.

3. Mobility Plan 2035 enacted a ‘Vision Zero’ for Los Angeles, with the goal of eliminating traffic-related deaths within 20 years. In order to meet this goal, LADOT identified a “High Injury Network” to prioritize safety improvements on L.A.’s most dangerous streets. However, after a year and a half, we still haven’t seen much action to reduce transportation-related deaths on City streets. What do you see as the hold-ups for improving safety on Los Angeles streets, and how would you work to address these impediments in reducing speeding to save lives?

LADOT has a mandate to reduce fatalities and serious injuries 20% by 2017. Well, it’s already 2017 and we’re not on track – not even close. We need to act faster and to treat traffic deaths like the public health crisis they are. In District 5, we’re fortunate to have relatively little violent crime (though that is changing). Instead, our residents are more likely to be killed or seriously injured while crossing the street, riding their bike, or driving their car. As the LADOT statistics show, older adults and young children are at the greatest risk, so safe routes to schools and improvements near senior centers – including our sidewalks – are particularly important.

Intransigence from some members of the Council has been a significant factor. Council members have a responsibility to listen to and respect their constituents, but in the face of a crisis, a true leader shouldn’t be paralyzed just because they don’t have 100% consensus. The focus should be on safety first and to listen to a greater cross-section of the community and work to build consensus, be open and honest, and make decisions based on facts

The High Injury Network identifies multiple streets in District 5, including Westwood, Santa Monica, Pico, 3rd, Beverly, Fairfax, and Ventura.  Based on community feedback, I would add Overland Ave. near the Expo line as a dangerous street as well, where an organized group of nearby residents is publicly protesting the speed of vehicles on the now six-lane highway.  If elected, I would sit down as soon as possible with LADOT to understand what projects are planned along these streets and get to work engaging stakeholders along each corridor.

4. Angelenos recently approved Metro’s transportation funding plan, Measure M, with an impressive mandate of support from over 71% of voters. What opportunities do you see for Measure M to improve the options for how Angelenos get around? Given that Measure M will return millions of dollars directly to the City of Los Angeles each year, do you support increasing the funding the City allocates to making it easier and safer for Angelenos to walk and bike?

Measure M is an important statement that Angelenos are willing to invest in improving their own mobility. It is a mandate to redouble our efforts to build transit, walking, and biking infrastructure so that we can have the more balanced transportation system that voters are demanding. The transit projects promised by Measure M—including the Purple Line extension to Westwood and the Sepulveda Pass transit project— will be the most exciting things to happen in the next term of the CD5 councilmember.  But the projects will only achieve their potential if the City makes the streets around each station more accessible for walking, biking, and buses, which are how over 90% of Metro customers access transit. I am aware of the great planning for first and last-mile that is starting to happen at Metro and support it wholeheartedly.  But I’m equally aware that the wrong leadership in a particular district can thwart Metro’s efforts, as I described in my Daily News op ed.

Mobility Plan 2035 calls for 20% of local return to be dedicated for walking and biking. The City currently only dedicates 10% of Measure R. I support Mobility Plan 2035’s dedication of funding. I also would make sure that all projects funded through local return are compliant with complete streets, which will require greater coordination between LADOT and BSS.

5. There is universal agreement that Westwood Boulevard is a dangerous street for people walking and bicycling. Westwood Boulevard is identified as a corridor on LADOT’s High Injury Network, bike lanes were considered a priority in the 2010 Bike Plan, and the project has wide community support, including from UCLA and the Westwood Village Improvement Association. However, implementation of continuous bicycle infrastructure on Westwood has stalled for years. Prioritization of safety improvements for the street was removed from the Mobility Plan 2035 by an amendment co-authored by Councilmember Koretz. Will you commit to implementing quality bicycle infrastructure on Westwood Boulevard during the next Council term? (If not, what specific alternative do you support to improve the safety of people walking and bicycling in the area, and to address the high rate of crashes related to speeding on Westwood Boulevard?)

Absolutely, the current situation is incredibly dangerous for people walking and biking—and driving too. Councilmember Koretz’s flip-flopping on this issue is a complete failure of leadership. It is not ok to say that a street on the High Injury Network is too dangerous to be improved, which is essentially Koretz’s position. The City’s job is to make it not dangerous. We need to complete the LADOT study, evaluate what makes sense in partnership with all community stakeholders, and commit to moving forward with safety improvements on Westwood. We might not get to 100% consensus, but I believe we can come up with a solution that satisfies the reasonable majority that wants to make things better.

6. Bike share systems have started to be installed across Los Angeles, but as systems expand to different areas of Los Angeles and neighboring cities, experts foresee two major obstacles: stations that are discontinuous/too far apart and stations with unsafe walking conditions that limit access. How would you envision the growth of bike share in the City of Los Angeles and regionally?

It is incredibly exciting that Los Angeles finally has bike share, and I support the expansion of the bike share system.  In the short term, I’d like to see the bike share program built along the Expo Line in my district, specifically near the Palms station.  That said, I recognize that bike share works best when there is a minimum station density that makes the system useful and when it is installed in walkable, transit-oriented neighborhoods. Downtown certainly fits that mold.  While I want CD5 to get a bikeshare program, it might make more sense for the City to expand out from Downtown more methodically, even if that means taking longer to get to other parts of Los Angeles. I want to see the program set up for success more than anything.

Below is 2017 City Council District 5 Candidate Paul Koretz’ full questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.:

1. What role do you see for walking, biking, and transit in improving the lives of Angelenos?

I took a trip with an LA transportation planner friend to China in 1998. We visited a number of cities, most notably Beijing. Their system was one that I would to see us emulate. Millions of people were using bicycles, transit, and walking to get around. People were using bicycles everywhere. It was incredible. Hardly any private ownership of cars.

We met with government leaders and spoke with them about how difficult it was to get the public to move toward bicycles and to create bicycle lanes and paths in a built-out city where streets were designed for cars, like Los Angeles. We explained that we were trying to figure out how to move in their direction transportation-wise, and strongly encouraged them not to copy Los Angeles as they become more affluent and people want private ownership of cars. As the world knows now, they didn’t listen to us. Beijing traffic is a parking lot, and air quality is worse than LA on its worst day ever. Gas masks abound, and one can always see the air.

BICYCLING
We need to have a system of bike lanes that is connected enough that less skillful cyclists can get to their destinations without fear of being hit. Right now, most of our system is still bits and pieces. We need to move towards a connected system that would allow a much higher percentage of cyclists to get to their destinations by bicycle. (Personally, I did the 500 mile+ California AIDS Ride, but I don’t possess the skill to ride my bicycle safely to work at City Hall on a major commercial street like Beverly Boulevard without a bike lane). I have
helped us to move in that direction. Working with the late Bill Rosendahl, we had the City commit to spending a percentage of our Measure R funds on bicycle and pedestrian improvements, which I believe was a first. I also helped get a substantial grant in the Mid-City West area for bike lane funding. Years ago, I cast the deciding vote to create the bike lanes on Santa Monica Boulevard in West Hollywood when I was on the City Council there. I have also been a supporter of bikesharing, and unsuccessfully objected to Los Angeles selecting a different vendor than other Westside Cities. We must make those systems work together for bikesharing to be as effective as possible.

PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
The logical thing to do to help people walk more (remember the song “Nobody Walks in LA”?) is to make crossings safer. As bureaucratic and costly as our process is, I have gotten new traffic signals added, with more in the process of being installed, like those on Pico Boulevard. There are more in the queue, including an important one on La Brea. I have also pushed our transportation bureaucracy to add a few seconds to crossings where senior citizens don’t have enough time. In addition, the City of Los Angeles, at my request, is about to put in a mid-block crossing on Westwood Blvd. between Kinross and Weyburn in the Village, to make one of the most dangerous, frequently jaywalked spots safer. Also, we have abandoned some underground street crossings near schools because of dangers of adults loitering in the crossing and causing trouble. I believe those issues can be overcome and those crossings re-opened.

TRANSIT
Like bicycling, but even more so, connectivity is crucial. I believe many more people will use LYFT, Uber, taxis shuttles, bicycles and walking for the last mile, but 5, 10, even 20 mile gaps in our transit system make it almost impossible to rely on these transit options as an alternative to the automobile. Also, some flaws such as the atgrade crossing of EXPO at Overland and Westwood slow north-south traffic while reducing east-west traffic. I fought against that element of the EXPO line once I was elected to Council, but it was already a done deal, and the EXPO Board voted unanimously for the at-grade crossing. I was appointed to the Board after that.

I have helped to get the EXPO Line built while a member of the EXPO Board, and have supported the Purple Line connecting much of my district to transit.

I am pushing for adoption of a different mode of transportation, Personalized Rapid Transit, or PRT, to fill the gaps in our system. It is inexpensive (roughly 20 million dollars a mile!), quick to build, partly because it is largely prefabricated, cheap to maintain, bypasses stops until the destination is reached, and at top speed (with the newest technology being modeled in Tel Aviv) can travel 155 miles an hour. It is a system of above-ground automated vehicles that provide a personally safe environment because, the way in which its designed, you are only physically travelling with your those in your own party. Also, PRT exists in various places in the world, including an older system in Morgantown, West Virginia, which has a history of no fatalities.

A complete PRT system could be built that connects all the gaps in our system in as quickly as five years. This would be critical, not only to quickly address our worsening traffic, but because automobiles create much of our climate-changing air pollution. Climate scientists agree that without reducing our greenhouse gases dramatically within ten years, we may reach the point of no return for human survival. If we can build such a system and get other cities across the country and the world to do the same, we can contribute mightily toward reducing climate change. Also, Measure M does not fully fund the transit lines identified in the Measure, and some will not be built for 20 years or more even if we do get the funding. Using PRT, the entire plan could be funded with only the Measure M money, and the projects could be completed decades ahead of schedule.

A positive development to transit in LA is that millennials seem very willing to abandon automobile usage. If this trend continues, combined with the development of these modes, we may be able to dramatically reduce traffic and air pollution in the coming years.

2. In 2015, Los Angeles approved Mobility Plan 2035, the first update to the Transportation Element of its General Plan since 1999. Mobility Plan 2035 puts “safety first” in transportation decisions, and provides a vision for a transportation system composed of safe and quality transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and automotive options. Do you support the goals of this plan, and how would you like to see the plan implemented in CD5?

Yes, I support the goals of this plan, and have received some blowback from constituents for doing so. Many are angry because of the places where we have reduced a lane of traffic and replaced it with a bike lane, such as on a portion of Palms Blvd. Drivers are inconvenienced and they don’t see many bicycles on the bike lanes. I recognize that it may take some time for both a cultural mindset shift toward thinking more of bicycles as a viable mode of transportation, and greater connectivity of bike lanes to make them a more widely used alternative. It takes some vision.

My answer to question one also describes my vision for implementation of the Mobility Plan in CD5, as well as across the city.

3. Mobility Plan 2035 enacted a ‘Vision Zero’ for Los Angeles, with the goal of eliminating traffic-related deaths within 20 years. In order to meet this goal, LADOT identified a “High Injury Network” to prioritize safety improvements on L.A.’s most dangerous streets. However, after a year and a half, we still haven’t seen much action to reduce transportation-related deaths on City streets. What do you see as the hold-ups for improving safety on Los Angeles streets, and how would you work to address these impediments in reducing speeding to save lives?

The City of LA is using a data driven approach to prioritizing intersections and neighborhoods where a high percentage of traffic fatalities and severe injuries occur. Other government entities, especially LAUSD, employ a more haphazard approach. In many instances, LAUSD is listening to the loudest voices, especially those of LAUSD parents, to drive their priorities. A successful program will not work that way. These solutions must be data driven. We all need to get on the same page so we can coordinate and prioritize the right intersections. This is clearly one of the hold-ups. I will work with the County, School District and City to prioritize the areas of greatest need. Funding is limited (although we recently obtained additional grant funding) and must be spent in a very targeted way.

One of the impediments is simply that everything involving government takes time. Things are moving forward, but on a methodical timetable. Also, everything involving engineering and construction takes a lot of time, so the first and most expeditious area of focus is the public education and outreach component.

Some progress has already been made. LADOT has identified a network of streets as a High Injury Network (HIN), where strategic investments will have the most impact in reducing severe injuries and deaths. Despite making up only 6% of our city streets, almost 2/3rds of pedestrian deaths and serious injuries occur in the HIN. People walking and biking combined statistically make up for 15% of collisions, but account for 50% of all deaths. It has been decided that this is where the earliest focus will be. We are developing a citywide media campaign, implementing the vision zero education and outreach strategy. An RFQ process is concluding and contracts are soon to be awarded, after which a planning phase will occur, and then the outreach and education will commence.

We are also increasing enforcement in the HIN, but traffic enforcement has limited success. After heavy enforcement in an area, people return to their old habits in a month or two. We don’t have resources to constantly patrol every area that needs it. However, in many areas we can’t even use radar and ticket speeders because our speed surveys have expired. We must follow through on our Vision Zero goal of updating 100% of the expired speed surveys by 2017.

San Francisco’s Vision Zero effort utilizes an online tracking tool so people can see what is being done in real time and hold the city and their elected leaders accountable. This would also provide more awareness to the public of the areas in which progress is being made and the things that are being done. I am going to explore introducing a motion when Council returns to session, to suggest that we implement such a tool.

4. Angelenos recently approved Metro’s transportation funding plan, Measure M, with an impressive mandate of support from over 71% of voters. What opportunities do you see for Measure M to improve the options for how Angelenos get around? Given that Measure M will return millions of dollars directly to the City of Los Angeles each year, do you support increasing the funding the City allocates to making it easier and safer for Angelenos to walk and bike?

I proudly supported and campaigned for the passage of Measure M. It will make a tremendous difference in how Angelenos get around. I will continue to advocate for State and Federal funding to expedite the construction of Measure M projects.

I support prioritizing the projects that move around the most number of people, not just the most number of automobiles. This includes projects that improve pedestrian and bike infrastructure, improve sidewalks, and multi-modal projects that increase the vibrancy of local streets and neighborhoods. Working with Mayor Garcetti, I will continue to hold the Metro Board accountable and ensure that they follow through with their commitment to improving bicycle and pedestrian safety.

Of course, I support increasing funding to make it easier and safer for Angelenos to walk and bike. As previously mentioned, I pushed to spend money on biking and pedestrian infrastructure with Measure R local return funds as a member of the City Council’s Transportation Committee and budget committee, and supported the LA City Bicycle Plan in 2010. I will continue to lead the effort to prioritize such spending.

5. There is universal agreement that Westwood Boulevard is a dangerous street for people walking and bicycling. Westwood Boulevard is identified as a corridor on LADOT’s High Injury Network, bike lanes were considered a priority in the 2010 Bike Plan, and the project has wide community support, including from UCLA and the Westwood Village Improvement Association. However, implementation of continuous bicycle infrastructure on Westwood has stalled for years. Prioritization of safety improvements for the street was removed from the Mobility Plan 2035 by an amendment co-authored by Councilmember Koretz. Will you commit to implementing quality bicycle infrastructure on Westwood Boulevard during the next Council term? (If not, what specific alternative do you support to improve the safety of people walking and bicycling in the area, and to address the high rate of crashes related to speeding on Westwood Boulevard?)

I agree that Westwood Boulevard is a dangerous street for people walking and bicycling in Westwood Village. It is a corridor on LADOT’s High Injury Network. That is why I want to discourage cyclists from using this street. As the Councilmember representing Westwood Village, I consider any other approach to be totally irresponsible. I did not support the location that was proposed for the Mobility Plan 2035. This proposal would have squeezed bike lanes onto Westwood Boulevard, while not taking into consideration the dangers this presents to bike riders. There would have been too many spots for interaction between cyclists and buses, as well as cars making turns. Because I agree that there needs to be a North-South route into Westwood and UCLA, I support moving the bike lane ONE BLOCK over to much safer Gayley Avenue, which does not have 900 buses and tens of thousands of cars daily. Having to travel one extra block for safety purposes seems like a tiny sacrifice worth making. I would note that the Westwood Blvd. route has widespread community opposition, including every Westwood homeowners association, neighborhood council, and community council. It also has the opposition of the business organization that officially covers Westwood Village, the West Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce.

I just want to highlight that while on the L.A. City Council, I have provided leadership on a number of bicycle related issues:

  • I helped secure very substantial funding for bike lanes in the Mid-City West area;
  • I helped implement a set of bike lanes that cross West Hollywood and Los Angeles boundaries on Fairfax Avenue;
  • As a member of the Council’s Transportation Committee, I worked with the late Councilmember Bill Rosendahl, then Chair of the Transportation Committee, to fund the installation of many bike lanes and pavement marking projects throughout the City;
  • I authored the motion adopted by the City Council to permit a person to secure their bicycle on a parking meter stand without violating city law; and
  • I authored a motion adopted by the City Council directing several city departments to report back quarterly on their progress of implementing the 2010 bike plan, which is part of the City’s commitment to transform L.A. to a multi-modal transportation system.

As for pedestrian safety, I am pushing for mid-block crosswalks where possible, to prevent mid-block jaywalking accidents. A key midblock crosswalk location is about to be installed in Westwood Village on Westwood Blvd. soon.

6. Bike share systems have started to be installed across Los Angeles, but as systems expand to different areas of Los Angeles and neighboring cities, experts foresee two major obstacles: stations that are discontinuous/too far apart and stations with unsafe walking conditions that limit access. How would you envision the growth of bike share in the City of Los Angeles and regionally?

One of the most valuable elements of bike share is to provide the first mile/last mile to transit. We need to expand to have bikeshare at every transit stop. Also, I believe bikeshare will initially draw in a high percentage of more casual riders—one would hope bikeshare would be placed near bike lanes and paths to provide greater safety for such riders. Studies have shown that bike share replaces some car trips and leads to greater levels of bike ownership, as more occasional riders become regular ones. As we expand bikeshare, we can keep stations more contiguous, which will help the program become more successful. We also should focus and spend some of our now-committed $25 million a year in sidewalk repair on the sidewalks near transit stations and bikeshare stations or in some cases both. I had to battle to get a sidewalk built leading to the Sepulveda EXPO station, and am still fighting to get passible sidewalks leading to a couple of the other EXPO stations in my district. These would be needed for bike share placements as well.

We also need to be sure that bikeshare vendors across city lines can work in cooperation with each other. I argued against LA selecting a different vendor from the vendor selected in other Westside cities because of the difficulties in coordination. Inability to coordinate will make bikeshare much less practical where LA shares boundaries with other cities such as Culver City, Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, and Santa Monica. A mutual acceptance policy must be implemented by all these cities, including LA.

Below is 2017 City Council District 5 Candidate Mark Herd’s full questionnaire response to Bike The Vote L.A.:

1. What role do you see for walking, biking, and transit in improving the lives of Angelenos?

Ending gridlock is one of my goals and walking, biking and transit infrastructure improvements are part of the solution.

 

2. In 2015, Los Angeles approved Mobility Plan 2035, the first update to the Transportation Element of its General Plan since 1999. Mobility Plan 2035 puts “safety first” in transportation decisions, and provides a vision for a transportation system composed of safe and quality transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and automotive options. Do you support the goals of this plan, and how would you like to see the plan implemented in CD5?

I support the goals and would like to see it implemented with the blessing of the community where changes would be made.

 

3. Mobility Plan 2035 enacted a ‘Vision Zero’ for Los Angeles, with the goal of eliminating traffic-related deaths within 20 years. In order to meet this goal, LADOT identified a “High Injury Network” to prioritize safety improvements on L.A.’s most dangerous streets. However, after a year and a half, we still haven’t seen much action to reduce transportation-related deaths on City streets. What do you see as the hold-ups for improving safety on Los Angeles streets, and how would you work to address these impediments in reducing speeding to save lives?

 

Infrastructure spending or lack of it is probably the biggest holdup.  Reckless over-development also turns safe intersections into death traps yet our leaders continue to favor developers over the needs of the community.  I will put the community first always. 

 

4. Angelenos recently approved Metro’s transportation funding plan, Measure M, with an impressive mandate of support from over 71% of voters. What opportunities do you see for Measure M to improve the options for how Angelenos get around? Given that Measure M will return millions of dollars directly to the City of Los Angeles each year, do you support increasing the funding the City allocates to making it easier and safer for Angelenos to walk and bike?

 

Measure R and Measure M both help L.A. tremendously and we must continue to improve and expand our transportation infrastructure and transportation options.  I will continue to push for more improvements if elected.

 

5. There is universal agreement that Westwood Boulevard is a dangerous street for people walking and bicycling. Westwood Boulevard is identified as a corridor on LADOT’s High Injury Network, bike lanes were considered a priority in the 2010 Bike Plan, and the project has wide community support, including from UCLA and the Westwood Village Improvement Association. However, implementation of continuous bicycle infrastructure on Westwood has stalled for years. Prioritization of safety improvements for the street was removed from the Mobility Plan 2035 by an amendment co-authored by Councilmember Koretz. Will you commit to implementing quality bicycle infrastructure on Westwood Boulevard during the next Council term? (If not, what specific alternative do you support to improve the safety of people walking and bicycling in the area, and to address the high rate of crashes related to speeding on Westwood Boulevard?)

 

Yes, I will commit to implementing quality bicycle infrasture on Westwood Blvd during the next Council term if that is what the community wants.

 

6. Bike share systems have started to be installed across Los Angeles, but as systems expand to different areas of Los Angeles and neighboring cities, experts foresee two major obstacles: stations that are discontinuous/too far apart and stations with unsafe walking conditions that limit access. How would you envision the growth of bike share in the City of Los Angeles and regionally?

 

I would like to see more funding to make access safer and stations more abundant.  I’d like to see L.A. as the greenest, cleanest and easiest city to get around in.  Building out quality bicycle infrastructure is important as we strive to make L.A. the cleanest city in the nation.

2017 Los Angeles CD11 Endorsement: Mike Bonin

Primary Election day: Tuesday, March 7, 7am-8pm
Find your Council District: http://neighborhoodinfo.lacity.org/
Find your polling place: http://lavote.net/locator

Representing Los Angeles’ Westside, Councilmember Mike Bonin has been a stalwart leader on moving Los Angeles toward becoming a more multi-modal City; and in ensuring quality and safe infrastructure for those who get around by bike, on foot, and by using public transit. After winning election in 2013, Bonin quickly showed a passion for a more progressive transportation system in taking public transit to City Hall on his first day in office.

As Chair of City Council’s Transportation Committee, Bonin has been, as Streetsblog LA puts it, “pretty much at the center of nearly every major transportation-related decision the city makes.” Bonin played a critical role in pushing forward and shepherding adoption of Los Angeles’ ambitious and potentially transformative Mobility Plan 2035, working it through a difficult political process and consistently framing the importance of the Plan with impassioned and inspiring introductions before Council. Bonin broke with unwritten Council protocol as one of two votes of dissent when Councilmembers Koretz and Price removed important streets from the Mobility Plan’s Bicycle Enhanced Network. Bonin has pushed for funding for active transportation, championed bike share, supported LADOT’s People St program, and is working toward bringing protected bike lanes to Venice Boulevard and expanding Breeze Bike Share in Venice. With this track record, it should come as no surprise that Councilmember Bonin’s tireless work on transportation recently earned him a Streetsie award as 2016 Elected Official of the Year.

In his response to a Bike The Vote L.A. questionnaire, Councilmember Bonin reinforces how important a role he has played – and will continue to play – in improving mobility options within Los Angeles. Bonin expressed his goal of implementing Mobility Plan 2035, his commitment to pursuing Vision Zero, and his important role in “working to change some of my colleague’s minds about the Bicycle Enhanced Network.”

Councilmember Mike Bonin has been a critical regional leader on active transportation, safe streets, and more livable communities. Bike The Vote L.A. is honored to endorse Mike Bonin for re-election to the City Council in District 11.

(See below for Mike Bonin’s response to Bike The Vote L.A.)

1. You are known as a multi-modal council member who frequently takes Metro to and from City Hall. How often do you commute by bike, and what are the impediments that keep you from biking to more destinations and with more frequency?

I have commuted to events in the district by bike, but the vast geography of the district I represent and packed schedule of meetings after events after meetings makes it difficult to build in the time necessary to bike to every event (it isn’t uncommon to have more than a dozen meetings or events in a single day).  When my schedule is localized to the Mar Vista area, I will spend the day on my bike between meetings, and like to take my son to preschool by bike.

2. What role do you see for walking, biking, and transit in improving the lives of Angelenos?

Giving people options other than single-passenger vehicles is central to my work as a Councilmember. Not only does a good multi-modal transportation system make sense for the people who want a healthier and more cost-effective way to get around, but it also makes life better for all Angelenos by taking cars off the road and pollution out of the air. Every person who decides to walk, bike or take transit is a car that isn’t on the road causing traffic.

3. Los Angeles recently lost a great leader who fought to improve the safety of cyclists in Los Angeles, former Councilmember Bill Rosendahl. Can you share a little of how Councilmember Rosendahl influenced your perspective and approach to transportation?

Bill and I had a very symbiotic relationship when it came to politics and policy. It was a little hard to tell where his passions and interests ended and mine began.  We both shared a love for neighborhoods and a hatred for traffic gridlock.  It’s hard not to have those feelings and not have a strong commitment to cycling and cyclists. Bill’s interest in standing up for cyclists had very little to do with the mode of transportation; it has everything to do with the fact that he felt people were being marginalized, and voices were being ignored, and that always infuriated him. I was proud to help convince Bill to take the Streetsblog challenge and and hop a bike for the first time in decades for an educational video.

4. You regularly host “Bike With Mike” events. What inspired you to lead these rides, and what have been some of the biggest takeaways from riding with constituents at these events?

I made “Bike with Mike” events a regular part of my Access 11 program for a few reasons. First, Access 11 is intended to improve accessibility to local government by “bringing City Hall to the Westside” and giving people an opportunity to meet with their Councilmember without forcing them to trek downtown. “Bike with Mike” events allow me to meet neighbors who might not come out to an office hours event or to a community meeting. “Bike with Mike” events also offer neighbors, and especially families with young children, a family-friendly community event to participate in, where they can meet their neighbors and learn more about their community. Finally, I host these events to show that there is great, easy and enjoyable opportunities for people to bike in LA. I have been very happy that these “Bike with Mike” events are some of the best-attended Access 11 events I host, and I look forward to continuing to host them in my next term.

5. You were a critical figure in City Council in getting Mobility Plan 2035, Los Angeles’ guide for transportation, adopted. Why did you support the Mobility Plan, and what are the next steps to making its vision of safe mobility options – including a Bicycle Enhanced Network – a reality?

Nearly half of all trips taken in Los Angeles are less than three miles in length, but nearly 90% of those trips are done in a car. It makes no sense that generations of bad policy have forced people into their cars, and I championed the adoption of Mobility Plan 2035 because it will make our neighborhoods safer places to walk, bike and it will make taking transit easier and more convenient. Now that the Plan is adopted (repeatedly), I am going to work with the Department of Transportation and my colleagues on the City Council to make sure it is actually implemented. This will mean pursuing important goals like Vision Zero and working to change some of my colleague’s minds about the Bicycle Enhanced Network so people will be able to bike between neighborhoods with safe and convenient routes.

6. You expressed support for Metro’s funding ballot measure, Measure M. Why do you support Measure M, and what opportunities does it provide for Los Angeles both locally and regionally?

Getting Measure M approved was a major priority for me in the November election because it will be a game-changer for transportation in LA. Not only will an expanded transit network let people get out of their cars, but some of the biggest projects (such as the airport-Metro connection and rail through the Sepulveda Pass) dramatically improve life for people on the Westside by eliminating a significant amount of soul-sucking traffic, but the money that is dedicated to active transportation projects will provide needed funding for walking and biking infrastructure. I am very excited to serve as both the Chair of the City Council’s Transportation Committee and as a Board Member on the Metro Board of Directors, which will give me an influential voice in how this money is prioritized.

In April of this year, our members researched, sent questionnaires out, and reviewed candidates for State and County offices, making a series of endorsements for candidates that will help to move L.A. forward in providing better mobility options. Many of our endorsements and recommendations made it through the Primary and now face a challenge in an important General Election that unfortunately is overshadowed by an insane Presidential race.

The California General Election also sees a long list of State Propositions and local Ballot Measures for voters to decide on. A group of our members met to review and discuss decisions facing L.A. Voters. Please see below for our endorsements and #BikeTheVote on November 8th!

image

2016 California General Election: Tuesday, November 8th, 7am-8pm
Bike The Vote L.A. 2016 Santa Monica Voter Guide: http://bit.ly/btv2016sm
Register to Vote (deadline 10/24): http://bit.ly/btvregister
Find your polling place: http://lavote.net/locator

ENDORSEMENT: HENRY STERN FOR CA SENATE DISTRICT 27

The contest to succeed Senator Fran Pavley in California State Senate District 27 is a tight race between two accomplished candidates. We received very thoughtful and promising responses to our questionnaire from both run-off candidates, Henry Stern and Janice Kamenir-Reznik. Both candidates laid out an encouraging understanding of what it will take to develop a more sustainable transportation system. And each focused on prioritizing active transportation for the benefit of District 27, which encompasses the western San Fernando Valley (including Encino, Canoga Park, Woodland Hills, Porter Ranch, Reseda, and Tarzana) as well as parts of Ventura County.

We are particularly encouraged by Henry Stern’s first-hand experience in advancing sustainable transportation options as the senior policy advisor to Senator Pavley, his commitment to double funding for the state Active Transportation Program, and his own personal experience as a daily bicycle commuter in Sacramento. With his depth of experience advocating for a more sustainable California, it is no surprise that he is endorsed by the Sierra Club and the California League of Conservation Voters. As an advocate for sustainable transportation options, Henry Stern earns our endorsement for California State Senate District 27.

[Click HERE for Henry Stern’s full Bike The Vote L.A. questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: JOSH NEWMAN FOR CA SENATE DISTRICT 29

Senator Bob Huff fas represented Senate District 29 since 2008, and unfortunately has a poor record on active transportation, with a failing 50% grade from the CalBike on his 2015 voting record. With that recent history, the stakes could not be higher for the eastern Los Angeles County communities of West Covina, Diamond Bar, and Walnut. Josh Newman offers a welcome and much needed change for the district, with a strong platform on active transportation that includes sustained funding for bicycle infrastructure, support for Vision Zero, and a focus on the community health benefits of active transportation. We are proud to endorse Josh Newman for California State Senate, and look forward to seeing his leadership in Sacramento to promote a more sustainable Southern California.

[Click HERE for Josh Newman’s full CalBike questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: STEVEN BRADFORD FOR CA SENATE DISTRICT 35

While in the State Assembly, Steven Bradford used his 22+ years of bicycle riding in the Los Angeles area – and his unfortunate experience having been hit 4 times by drivers while biking – to motivate his push for one of the most significant pieces of safe streets legislation to date in California, the Three Feet For Safety Act of 2013, also known as ‘Give Me 3.’ In 2014, Bradford authored legislation to remove a loophole that reduced the penalties for drivers who commit hit and run crimes. In his response to CalBike’s questionnaire, Bradford showed his commitment to safer streets through funding for bicycle infrastructure, a Vision Zero goal to end traffic deaths in California, and to increase bicycle commuting in the area. With his personal experience averaging 100 miles of riding a week, and his long track record on legislation to make cycling safer, it is no surprise that he is endorsed by Ted Rogers of Biking in LA. We are honored to join Ted in endorsing Steven Bradford for the California State Senate.

[Click HERE for Steven Bradford’s full CalBike questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: LAURA FRIEDMAN FOR CA ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 43

Laura Friedman is a spectacular advocate for environmental issues in Southern California and a champion for making Los Angeles County safer for biking. As a Glendale City Council Member, Friedman installed a bike rack in her city-provided parking space, and was a highly visible fixture in the Los Angeles region as a bike-commuting elected official. The Los Angeles cycling community is likely familiar with Friedman from her work in coordination with Walk/Bike Glendale and her participation in various Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition events. Silver Lake, Los Feliz, and Atwater Village residents likely remember her bold support for a safe Hyperion Bridge. In her response to CalBike’s questionnaire, Friedman expressed support to increase funding for active transportation, to prioritize first mile/last mile bicycle infrastructure, and to build equity into bike share systems across California. While outgoing Assembly Member Mike Gatto has been an effective advocate working to curb hit & run crimes, we can think of no greater leader than Friedman to represent Silver Lake, Los Feliz, Atwater Village, East Hollywood, Burbank, and Glendale in making the Los Angeles region more bike-friendly. Knowing that she will make an exceptional leader on active transportation issues, we are delighted to endorse Laura Friedman for California State Assembly.

[Click HERE for Laura Friedman’s full CalBike questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: RICHARD BLOOM FOR CA ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 50

In 2015, incumbent Assembly Member Richard Bloom was honored with the first ever Streetsblog California Legislator of the Year “Streetsie” Award. As chair of the Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Resources and Transportation, Bloom has been and continues to be an important leader at the state level for safer streets. Last year he co-authored AB 902, a new program that provides bicycling education as a diversion for traffic tickets for bicyclists. Bloom is championing a number of proposals to improve active transportation, including bills that would build environmental justice into transportation decision making, and which would provide permanent funding for the State’s Active Transportation Program. Bloom has done an excellent job promoting sustainability for Santa Monica, Hollywood, West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Miracle Mile, and Malibu, and we are honored to endorse him for a third term in the California State Assembly.

[Click HERE for Richard Bloom’s full Bike The Vote L.A. questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: AL MURATSUCHI FOR CA ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 66

Residents of the South Bay are seeing a tight assembly race between incumbent Assembly Member David Hadley and former Assembly Member Al Muratsuchi to represent Assembly District 66. Of the candidates, only Muratsuchi responded to CalBike’s survey to outline his platform on active transportation. Muratsuchi’s response was very encouraging, with a focus on reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) to provide a more sustainable transportation system, and a commitment to fund active transportation programs to make cycling and walking more viable options for Angelenos. Muratsuchi also made it clear in his responses to CalBike that he recognizes that Southern California cannot solve its transportation challenges through freeway expansion, and notes his commitment to fund public transit as a component of a providing better transportation options. The South Bay deserves a candidate who will stand up for providing safe and efficient mobility options, and we are proud to endorse Al Muratuchi to help bring that positive change at the state level.

[Click HERE for Al Muratsuchi’s full CalBike questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: JANICE HAHN FOR L.A. COUNTY SUPERVISOR DISTRICT 4

A current U.S. Representative and former L.A. City Councilmember, Janice Hahn has a history of consistent support for biking and progressive transportation. While serving on the City Council, she voted for L.A.’s 2010 Bicycle Master Plan. We noted in the June California Primary Election that Hahn was the only District 4 candidate to respond a questionnaire by LACBC. Her response was solid: showing that she supports implementation of the County’s own Bicycle Master Plan, protected bike lanes, Bike Share, and (recently adopted) Vision Zero. While we had some concern with Hahn’s suggestion that traffic congestion might be a target of environmental mitigation rather than vehicle miles traveled (VMT) – the standard that California is working to reposition environmental laws to address – we still saw her as the strongest candidate in the race, giving her an A- grade.

In a race to replace Supervisor Don Knabe, this race has the potential to shift the formerly conservative L.A. County Board of Supervisors towards a progressive supermajority. Based on her progressive record on transportation and safe streets, we have great hope that Hahn will toward solutions that improve the quality of mobility options across the Los Angeles region. Bike The Vote L.A. endorses Janice Hahn for Los Angeles County Supervisor.

[Click HERE for Janice Hahn’s full LACBC questionnaire responses]


ENDORSEMENT: L.A. COUNTY MEASURE A

Parks are an important component of a healthy and sustainable city. Their mere presence helps to improve air quality, and those of us who bike often find ourselves using them as either destinations, or routes to pass through.

It’s no secret that Los Angeles needs more and better parks and recreational amenities. According to the most recent Los Angeles County Park Needs Assessment, less than half of County residents live within one-half mile of a park, and a majority of residents live in neighborhoods with less than 1.5 acres of park land per 1,000 population. As Investing in Place notes, places with poor park access tend to suffer from health disparities and economic hardships compared with better-served communities. And many of the parks that do exist are in a state of disrepair.

Measure A provides an important funding source to ensure a healthier city, and encourages more residents to get outside and enjoy it. We urge a “YES” vote on L.A. County Measure A.

[Click HERE for Bike The Vote L.A.’s full Endorsement of Measure A]


ENDORSEMENT: L.A. COUNTY METRO MEASURE M

Measure M is Metro’s ambitious ballot measure to extend an existing ½ cent sales tax (2008’s Measure R) in perpetuity, and supplement it with another ½ cent sales tax. Creating a 1 cent sales tax with no expiration date gives Metro much more flexibility to expedite projects to flesh out its transportation system. Many of these projects are high profile: a transit connection to LAX, a transit tunnel under the Sepulveda Pass, a Northern extension of the Crenshaw Line that could hit West Hollywood, a transit line to serve the congested Vermont corridor, and closure of a gap of the L.A. River Bike Path through Downtown. Accordingly, Measure M features an impressive list of endorsements, including The Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, Investing In Place, Streetsblog LA, The L.A. League of Conservation Voters and The L.A. Times.

Somewhat lost in the big name projects necessary to gain broader support are the very real benefits to existing transit users and residents in the form of improved bus service, repair of L.A.’s decaying streets and sidewalks, and dedicated funding for the next generation of regional bikeways.

Measure M provides the funding framework and vision for a transformation of Los Angeles’ transportation system. Advocates will have to continue to work to make sure that funding is implemented efficiently and equitably, but we see it as a huge step towards building a transportation system with quality mobility options. Bike The Vote L.A. urges a “YES” vote on L.A. County Metro Measure M on November 8th.

[Click HERE for Bike The Vote L.A.’s full Endorsement of Measure M]

image

A current U.S. Representative and former L.A. City Councilmember, Janice Hahn has a history of consistent support for biking and progressive transportation. While serving on the City Council, she voted for L.A.’s 2010 Bicycle Master Plan. We noted in the June California Primary Election that Hahn was the only District 4 candidate to respond a questionnaire by the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition. Her response was solid: showing that she supports implementation of the County’s Bicycle Master Plan, protected bike lanes, Bike Share, and (recently adopted) Vision Zero. While we had some concern with Hahn’s suggestion that traffic congestion might be a target of environmental mitigation rather than vehicle miles traveled (VMT) – the standard that California is working to reposition environmental laws to address – we still saw her as the strongest candidate in the race, giving her an A- grade.

In a race to replace Supervisor Don Knabe, this race has the potential to shift the formerly conservative L.A. County Board of Supervisors towards a progressive supermajority. Based on her progressive record on transportation and safe streets, we have great hope that Hahn will look toward solutions that improve the quality of mobility options across the Los Angeles region. Bike The Vote L.A. endorses Janice Hahn for Los Angeles County Supervisor.

(See below for full candidate LACBC questionnaire response)

1. Please share a memory involving a bicycle that has had a lasting effect on you (whether or not you were the one on the bicycle).

-Soon after I got divorced, I took my kids on our first solo vacation to Yosemite. We rented bikes. Mark, my youngest, was a toddler. He was on the toddler seat on the back of the bike. We rode through the majestic valley of Yosemite. Everyone was free and joyous, and I thought maybe everything will be alright. And, I hope that my kids were feeling the same way.

-Bishop Juan Carlos Mendes of South Gate told me that when he was 9 years old he won an essay contest and the prize was a bicycle. My father, Kenny Hahn, presented the bike to him over 50 years ago. The first time I met him the Bishop told me the story of getting the bike and what it meant to him. The story was a full circle because he got the bike from my dad and now he was my friend.  And, in the back of my mind, I always wondered what happened to my childhood bike – did it go to Bishop Mendes.

2. County supervisors have great power to improve the safety, health and livability of Los Angeles County through both their role on the Metro board shaping countywide transportation policy and investment decisions and through oversight of County departments, including Public Works, Public Health and Parks & Recreation. In 2012, the County of Los Angeles adopted a Bicycle Master Plan proposing 831 miles of new bikeways due to be completed by 2032. What would you do to ensure that implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan projects continues during your term? How many miles of new bicycle facilities will you commit to implementing each year in your district?

I will make sure to dedicate adequate funding and personnel to further advance the Bicycle Master Plan during my term as County Supervisor. I will ensure that we follow through with our adopted Bicycle Master Plan and as County Supervisor, I would do my utmost to build as many miles of bicycle facilities in my area as possible, and will keep our county on track towards reaching the ultimate 831 mile goal.

3. County Public Works design standards currently favor high speed traffic by requiring minimum lane widths larger than other transportation agencies. This has created an unnecessary barrier to implementing bicycle projects in urban unincorporated areas, resulting in shared “class III” bike routes on major streets where dedicated “class II” bike lanes would be more appropriate. Do you support adopting the Model Design Manual for Living Streets produced by the County Department of Public Health, but not yet adopted by Public Works?

Yes, I support an expanded vision for bike lanes throughout the city. I am confident that I, as a county supervisor, will be able to work with the other supervisors and various city agencies to come to an infrastructure solution that allows for both appropriate bike lanes and safe driving lanes. Not only will this allow more bicycle traffic, it will also keep bicycle riders safer by ensuring that car drivers have adequate space in their lanes to give bikers a space to share the road.

4. Studies have shown that protected bikeways (i.e. those that are separated from moving vehicles by a curb or parked cars) can reduce injuries by as much as 90%, while reducing collisions and improving safety for all road users. The County Bicycle Master Plan calls for the implementation of such facilities, but none have been planned on County streets to date. Would you support the implementation of protected bikeways, and can you suggest any areas in your district where such facilities should be built?

Protected bikeways are extremely valuable tools for keeping bikers safe from collisions, and I fully support a more aggressive program of creating such protected bikeways. As a county supervisor, I would look to implement such protected bikeways in areas that are popular amongst bikers, like in Long Beach. By starting in areas with heavy bike traffic, I hope to significantly reduce bike injuries and make bicycling a safer, more appealing option for people across the city.

5. In Los Angeles County, 19% of all trips are made on foot or by bike and 39% percent of those killed on our county’s streets are people walking and biking, yet Metro only allocates 1% of its funding to these modes of transportation. The three sales tax measures that generate a majority of Metro’s revenue (Proposition A, Proposition C and Measure R) dedicate 0% for walking and biking. Metro’s potential sales tax, the Metro Plan, could address these underfunding issues, do you support allocating at least 10% to active transportation as part of the Metro draft expenditure plan?

Yes.

6. In Los Angeles County, 34% of students walk or bike to school, while motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause of death for school-age youth. Many more parents don’t feel safe allowing their children to walk or bike to school, resulting in heavy vehicular traffic at school hours and dangerous levels of congestion in front of schools. Metro is currently drafting a countywide Safe Routes to School Strategic Plan, but without an implementation strategy or dedicated funding. Do you support dedicated funding for a countywide Safe Routes to School program that would improve safety for children and parents, and encourage more biking and walking to the over 2,000 public schools in Los Angeles County?

Yes, I support implementing a program that will improve the health and safety of our school children by reducing traffic congestion and encouraging them to walk and bike to school more often. Encouraging biking to school not only protects our environment, it enhances quality of life by decreasing traffic and getting kids moving.

7. The County of Los Angeles is one of the region’s largest employers, generating significant traffic congestion and pollution around County facilities. Will you provide annual transit passes to all County employees and provide secure bicycle parking for both employees and visitors at County buildings?

I absolutely support utilizing alternatives methods of transportation to improve the environment and help reduce congestion around Los Angeles. I would definitely support installing bicycle parking at County buildings and am also very willing to provide county employees with incentives to use more economically-friendly methods of transportation.

8. If elected, what would you do to reduce and prevent collisions involving pedestrians, bicyclists and other vulnerable road users? Would you support a countywide Vision Zero campaign and how would you incorporate education, enforcement, engineering, and engagement into that campaign?

I would absolutely support a countywide Vision Zero campaign. Public safety is of utmost importance to me and that includes collision prevention. I would support educational programs for police officers, public transportation officials, and civilians alike to help everyone understand the rules, regulations, and responsibilities of transportation in our city.

9. AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, calls for the reduction of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2020. Passed two years later, SB 375 requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to reduce emissions from passenger vehicles and requires regional metropolitan planning organizations to develop “Sustainable Communities Strategies” that integrate transportation, land-use, and housing policies that plan to achieve the emissions targets for their regions. Given that almost half of emissions in LA County come from motor vehicles, what specific policies or plans do you think local cities should implement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector?

Everywhere I go in L.A. County, I sit in traffic, and traffic leads to greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately it plagues our region and our environment, and it’s a reality that we live with every single day.

As a member of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee in the U.S House of Representatives, I have been pushing for increased investment in local transportation projects that give people more accessibility and  increased convenience when it comes to new, smart mass transit options. Still, with continued gridlock in Washington, I believe that it’s time to act locally to address these issue head-on.

In 2008, County residents voted for and passed Measure R, which provided billions of dollars in critical funding for transportation projects. While Measure R has helped tremendously, building new light-rail and subway networks, as well as better roads to help reduce some of the traffic—it clearly wasn’t enough. That’s why now the State Legislature and MTA Board are considering an extension of Measure R which I am in full support of.  With that said, however, I believe that we must make sure that whatever new mass transit measure is put forward, that it includes an inclusive plan to ensure that no community in the County is left behind or without mass transit options.

If we want to enact real, countywide reduction of greenhouse gases, then we ought to invest in mass transit projects in all corners of the County. This includes in the San Gabriel Valley in cities like Whittier, or in San Pedro, who got next to nothing from Measure R. It also means ensuring that the Green Line’s proposed extension of a mono-rail or a people-mover that goes all the way into LAX Airport, actually gets built so that less airport travelers will clog up the 405 freeway in and around Marina del Ray and the Beach Cities. Beyond mass transit, I believe the County can play a role in developing other non-vehicle related transit projects like safe bike lanes as well as more pedestrian-friendly and walkable community-based developments. And, I think the County has the ability to offer incentives to encourage commuters to do their part by minimizing the number of trips they take in a car, or to increase the use of carpooling and utilizing mass transit options more frequently.

10. Support for Bike Share programs is growing across southern California. How do you see your district getting involved in this program? How can you make sure that Bike Share programs prioritize equity to ensure that working class and low-income community members benefit from the program?

I think Bike Share programs are wonderful and a great way to move Los Angeles into a less fuel dependent direction. With that being said, we need to make this a widespread initiative to include all communities, not just the most wealthy. In order to do so, I will get the County involved in Bike Share programs to make costs affordable, locations safe, and bikes accessible.

11. Multiple sources report that communities of color and low-income neighborhoods are more likely to get ticketed while riding their bike and burdened by the cost of tickets. Would you support actions to address this racial justice issue, such as a countywide ticket diversion program that allowed people ticketed for certain infractions to attend a class on safe bicycle riding and thus reduce their fines?

Yes. Absolutely. Discrimination of all kinds is flat out unacceptable and I will work on the Board of Supervisors combat it where ever possible. That means instituting a countywide ticket diversion program and ensuring that peace officers do not target communities of color.

Thank you.